JRSM > Volume 101, Number 7 > Pp. 372-380

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data tables for Morris et al. Send a Quick Comment Quick Comments: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Quick Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JRSM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Morris, S. Articles by Sutton, M. PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Analysis of consultants' NHS and private incomes in England in 2003/4

Stephen Morris Reader  ¹ Bob Elliott Professor and Unit Director  ² Ada Ma Research Fellow  ³ Alex McConnachie Statistician  ⁴ Nigel Rice Reader  ⁵ Diane Skåtun Research Fellow  ³   Matt Sutton Professor  ⁶

¹ Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University UK
² Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen UK
³ Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen UK
⁴ Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow UK
⁵ Centre for Health Economics, University of York UK
⁶ Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen UK

Correspondence to: Dr S Morris stephen.morris{at}brunel.ac.uk

Objective Consultants employed by the NHS in England are allowed to undertake private practice to supplement their NHS income. Until the introduction of a new contract from October 2003, those employed on full-time contracts were allowed to earn private incomes no greater than 10% of their NHS income. In this paper we investigate the magnitude and determinants of consultants' NHS and private incomes.

Design Quantitative analysis of financial data.

Setting A unique, anonymized, non-disclosive dataset derived from tax returns for a sample of 24,407 consultants (92.3% of the total) in England for the financial year 2003/4.

Main outcome methods The conditional mean total, NHS and private incomes earned by age group, type of contract, specialty and region of place of work.

Results The mean annual total, NHS and private incomes across all consultants in 2003/4 were £110,773, £76,628 and £34,144, respectively. Incomes varied by age, type of contract, specialty and region of place of work. The ratio of mean private to NHS income for consultants employed on a full-time contract was 0.26. The mean private income across specialties ranged from £5,144 (for paediatric neurology) to £142,723 (plastic surgery). There was a positive association between mean private income and NHS waiting lists across specialties.

Conclusions Consultants employed on full-time contracts on average exceeded the limits on private income stipulated by the 10% rule. Specialty is a more important determinant of income than the region in which the consultant works. Further work is required to explore the association between mean private income and waiting lists.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related articles in JRSM:

Private practice: Bevan's bogey

J Mark Aitken
JRSM 2008 101: 434. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J M. Aitken Private practice: Bevan's bogey J R Soc Med, September 1, 2008; 101(9): 434 - 434. [Full Text] [PDF]

Quick Comments:

Read all Quick Comments

Private Practice - Bevan's Bogey

J Mark AITKEN

JRSM Online, 1 Aug 2008 [Full text]