RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2008;101:416-422
doi:10.1258/jrsm.2007.070288
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JRSM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerrison, S.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The patient's experience of being a human subject

Susan Kerrison Sophie Laws Mary Cane   Alan Thompson

University College London NHS Foundation Trust Joint Biomedical Research Unit, Maples House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1 9LL, UK

Correspondence to Susan Kerrison s.kerrison{at}ucl.ac.uk

Objective To explore the patient's experience of clinical research with a view to improving its conduct.

Design Qualitative analysis of focus groups, semi-structured telephone interviews and questionnaires undertaken with subjects of clinical research.

Subjects 265 patients enrolled in two therapeutic and four non-therapeutic clinical studies were invited to take part. 95 agreed; 32 took part in focus groups, 34 in telephone interviews and 29 returned a questionnaire. Response rate (36%).

Results Most patients are channeled into research by the health care professionals treating them. Benefits of taking part were seen as: extra care; increased surveillance; obtaining expert information; and being able to help others. Participants also had criticisms which included lack of information about research findings, problems in making sense of adverse events, insufficient attention to their comfort and ‘unscientific’ aspects of particular studies.

Conclusion Participation in clinical research is not entirely altruistic. Patients expected reciprocity in their on-going relationship with the researcher. Therefore to help ensure that patients continue to support clinical research, we suggest that: time should be allowed for providing information; greater attention should be paid to physical comfort; opportunities should be provided for involvement in research design, in the excitement of research and for giving feedback on the findings; and contact between patients taking part in the same study should be facilitated. By investing in the idea of scientific progress through research, some subjects are able to transform their suffering into hope for the future.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related articles in JRSM:

A refuser's viewpoint on ‘the patient's experience of being a human subject’
Hazel Thornton
JRSM 2008 101: 484. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JRSMHome page
H. Thornton
A refuser's viewpoint on 'the patient's experience of being a human subject'
J R Soc Med, October 1, 2008; 101(10): 484 - 484.
[Full Text] [PDF]



How Not to be a Doctor