RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 1985;78:435-439
© 1985 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore-Gillon, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol 78, Issue 6 435-439, Copyright © 1985 by Royal Society of Medicine


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The nose after laryngectomy

V Moore-Gillon

Previous studies of nasal function after laryngectomy have suggested that patients must accept complete and irreversible anosmia as an inevitable consequence of the operation, and that this is due to interruption of a poorly defined neuronal interaction between larynx and nose. In this study nasal function was investigated in 23 laryngectomees and 10 patients about to undergo laryngectomy. Scanning electron microscopy showed a more densely ciliated nasal epithelium in the laryngectomees compared with the preoperative controls, and nasal mucociliary transport, measured by saccharine clearance, was significantly faster (P less than 0.01) in laryngectomees. Olfactory acuity, as determined by the threshold for detection of insufflated pyridine vapour, was normal in laryngectomees. Some laryngectomees did have a relatively normal sense of smell; these were shown to be those who had discovered a technique of sniffing using buccopharyngeal rather than respiratory musculature. These findings have obvious implications for the rehabilitation of laryngectomees, many of whom may otherwise have to contend with distressing anosmia as well as the other physical and psychological consequences of the operation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
F. J. M. Hilgers, H. A. Jansen, C. J. van As, M. F. Polak, M. J. Muller, and F. S. A. M. van Dam
Long-term Results of Olfaction Rehabilitation Using the Nasal Airflow-Inducing ("Polite Yawning") Maneuver After Total Laryngectomy
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, June 1, 2002; 128(6): 648 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M. Fujii, K. Fukazawa, C. Hatta, H. Yasuno, and M. Sakagami
Olfactory Acuity after Total Laryngectomy
Chem Senses, February 1, 2002; 27(2): 117 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
F. J. M. Hilgers, F. S. A. M. van Dam, S. Keyzers, M. N. Koster, C. J. van As, and M. J. Muller
Rehabilitation of Olfaction After Laryngectomy by Means of a Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver: The "Polite Yawning" Technique
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, June 1, 2000; 126(6): 726 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M Gleeson and P Jani
Long term care of patients who have had a laryngectomy
BMJ, June 4, 1994; 308(6942): 1452 - 1453.
[Full Text]



MDU Exam Doctor