Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol 78, Issue 8 630-633, Copyright © 1985 by Royal Society of Medicine
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
MJ Stower, SS Amar, T Mikulin, DM Kean and JD Hardcastle
The prognostic value of an erect and supine abdominal X-ray was studied prospectively in 97 patients with an acute abdomen. Although 64 (66%) of the radiographs showed an abnormality, the surgical registrar altered his clinical diagnosis on only seven occasions and changed his management on four. A consultant radiologist was the most accurate at reporting the X-rays even without seeing the patient, whilst junior surgical and radiological staff were as accurate as each other. A surgical registrar, however, was more accurate than junior radiologists in making a diagnosis. The investigation was of immediate clinical value in only 4% of the patients, and its use could probably be limited without detriment to patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J E Smith and E J Hall The use of plain abdominal x rays in the emergency department Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2009; 26(3): 160 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Rosen, D. Z. Sands, H. E. Longmaid III, K. F. Reynolds, M. Wagner, and V. Raptopoulos Impact of Abdominal CT on the Management of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Acute Abdominal Pain Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1391 - 1396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Harpole, R. Khorasani, J. Fiskio, G. J. Kuperman, and D. W. Bates Automated Evidence-based Critiquing of Orders for Abdominal Radiographs: Impact on Utilization and Appropriateness J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 1997; 4(6): 511 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||