Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol 80, Issue 10 620-623, Copyright © 1987 by Royal Society of Medicine
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
RF Gledhill
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa.
Intern responses to a questionnaire were used to evaluate an undergraduate clinical neurosciences programme. The data obtained were judged an authentic measure of instructional efficacy. Most interns rated themselves competent in performing the neurological examination but ill-equipped to interpret their findings and to manage effectively common problems, especially emergencies. Neurological diseases and the non-biomedical aspects of patient care were identified relatively infrequently as matters needing greater emphasis. Explanations for these findings may include a curriculum of traditional format, differences in teaching and assessing theoretical and practical competence, and the typical responsibilities of interns in an academic hospital. Intern evaluation of undergraduate clinical programmes can provide data useful to their development.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. C. Griggs and D. C. Anderson An important first step: A standard curriculum for the neurology clerkship Neurology, March 26, 2002; 58(6): 845 - 846. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.J. Gelb, C.H. Gunderson, K.A. Henry, H.S. Kirshner, and R.F. Jozefowicz The neurology clerkship core curriculum Neurology, March 26, 2002; 58(6): 849 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||