RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 1989;82:524-527
© 1989 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wheater, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol 82, Issue 9 524-527, Copyright © 1989 by Royal Society of Medicine

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Obstetric outcomes in West Cumberland Hospital: is there a risk from Sellafield?

KP Jones and AW Wheater
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, West Cumberland Hospital, Whitehaven, Cumbria.

A retrospective study was made of the obstetric outcome of 18,252 babies born in West Cumberland Hospital in the years 1975 to 1985. There were 934 premature births (before 37 weeks), 555 small for dates births (under 2.5 kg but not before 37 weeks), 167 stillbirths, 125 neonatal deaths and 236 reported congenital malformations. The 212 babies born to mothers from Seascale during that time were compared with the births to mothers from other areas in West Cumbria Health District in order to assess any adverse effect from possible radioactive discharge at nearby Sellafield. There was no evidence of any increased incidence of these outcomes in Seascale births. Adequate retrospective data on miscarriage rates were not available, but using indirect information on hospital inpatients, no statistically significant increased incidence was found, although the absolute numbers of miscarriage in Seascale were slightly higher than expected. From this evidence, no adverse effects on completed pregnancies can be attributed to the Sellafield plant of British Nuclear Fuels. However, a prospective study of miscarriage incidence in West Cumbria and near other nuclear installations is urgently needed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




MDU Exam Doctor

 RSM Journals - Obstetric Medicine International Journal of Care Pathways