RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 1995;88:213-216
© 1995 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalton, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol 88, Issue 4 213-216, Copyright © 1995 by Royal Society of Medicine


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Prehospital intravenous fluid replacement in trauma: an outmoded concept?

AM Dalton
Mayday University Hospital, Thornton Heath, Surrey, UK.

Details of 235 consecutive trauma patients brought to the Washington Hospital Trauma Center with intravenous infusions in situ were entered into the study. The volume of intravenous fluid administered prior to arrival at hospital and the time over which it was given (the infusion time) was recorded. The initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) on scene and the SBP on arrival at hospital were documented. A mean volume of 383 ml of intravenous fluid was administered over a mean time of 17 min. Of non-trapped patients 98% had infusion times of less than 30 min. Trapped or hypotensive patients were not given significantly more fluid than those who were not trapped or had SBPs of over 100 mm Hg. Because of the uncertain benefits and potential complications of this procedure, intravenous cannulation and fluid replacement may not be appropriate where expected prehospital time is likely to be less than 30 min.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
TraumaHome page
K. Allison and K. Porter
Consensus on the prehospital approach to burns patient management
Trauma, April 1, 2003; 5(2): 97 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]



How Not to be a Doctor