RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 1996;89:79-84
© 1996 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seamark, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol 89, Issue 2 79-84, Copyright © 1996 by Royal Society of Medicine

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Characteristics of referrals to an inpatient hospice and a survey of general practitioner perceptions of palliative care

DA Seamark, C Lawrence and J Gilbert
Postgraduate Medical School, University of Exeter, England.

In order to determine symptoms, drug prescribing and physical problems of patients referred to an inpatient hospice, case notes from 130 consecutive first admissions (95 general practitioner (GP) referrals, 35 consultant referrals) were analysed. GP referrals were more likely to be constipated, require care and be discharged to home. Consultant referrals were more gravely ill, dependent and more likely to die in the hospice. On admission 76 (58%) patients were receiving opiates with co-prescription of opiate and laxative occurring in 41% (31/76) of the cases. The prescription of laxatives with the symptoms of constipation occurred in 62% (26/42) of the cases on admission. A telephone survey of 79 referring GPs revealed that 37% had attended neither a course nor a lecture relevant to palliative care in the past 3 years. GPs experienced difficulties frequently or always in: (a) managing pain (8/79); (b) managing other symptoms (25/79); (c) helping patients and relatives cope with their emotional distress (18/79); and (d) coping with their own emotional responses to death and dying (5/79). In conclusion, the differences demonstrated between the GP and consultant referrals have implications for purchasers. The high incidence of possible opiate-induced side-effects and the difficulties with symptom control expressed by some GPs indicate a continuing need for effective educational input.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
R. Charlton and A. Currie
A UK Perspective on Worldwide Inadequacies in Palliative Care Training: A Short Postgraduate Course Is Proposed
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2008; 25(1): 63 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Palliat MedHome page
S. D. Borgsteede, L. Deliens, B. Beentjes, F. Schellevis, W. A.B. Stalman, J. Th.M. Van Eijk, and G. Van der Wal
Symptoms in patients receiving palliative care: a study on patient-physician encounters in general practice
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2007; 21(5): 417 - 423.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Palliat MedHome page
K. Thomas and B. Noble
Improving the delivery of palliative care in general practice: an evaluation of the first phase of the Gold Standards Framework
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 49 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
J. A. Paice, J. C. Muir, and S. Shott
Palliative care at the end of life: Comparing quality in diverse settings
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2004; 21(1): 19 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
J. D. Cowan, D. Burns, T. W. Palmer, J. Scott, and E. Feeback
A palliative medicine program in a community setting: 12 points from the first 12 months
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, November 1, 2003; 20(6): 415 - 433.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
K. Ogle, B. Mavis, and T. Wang
Hospice and primary care physicians: Attitudes, knowledge, and barriers
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2003; 20(1): 41 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Palliat MedHome page
G. K Mitchell
How well do general practitioners deliver palliative care? A systematic review
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2002; 16(6): 457 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
J. D. Cowan, D. Walsh, and J. Homsi
Palliative medicine in a United States cancer center: A prospective study
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2002; 19(4): 240 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Palliat MedHome page
P. J Franks, C. Salisbury, N. Bosanquet, E. K Wilkinson, S. Kite, A. Naysmith, and I. J Higginson
The level of need for palliative care: a systematic review of the literature
Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2000; 14(2): 93 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
S. Fordham and C. Dowrick
Is care of the dying improving? The contribution of specialist and non-specialist to palliative care
Fam. Pract., December 1, 1999; 16(6): 573 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



  RSM Press eJournals Collection 2010