RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2001;94:107-110
© 2001 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JRSM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevinson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ernst, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol 94, Issue 3 107-110, Copyright © 2001 by Royal Society of Medicine


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Neurological complications of cervical spine manipulation

C Stevinson, W Honan, B Cooke and E Ernst
Department of Complementary Medicine, University of Exeter, 25 Victoria Park Road, Exeter EX2 4NT. C.D.Stevinson@ex.ac.uk

To obtain preliminary data on neurological complications of spinal manipulation in the UK all members of the Association of British Neurologists were asked to report cases referred to them of neurological complications occurring within 24 hours of cervical spine manipulation over a 12-month period. The response rate was 74%. 24 respondents reported at least one case each, contributing to a total of about 35 cases. These included 7 cases of stroke in brainstem territory (4 with confirmation of vertebral artery dissection), 2 cases of stroke in carotid territory and 1 case of acute subdural haematoma. There were 3 cases of myelopathy and 3 of cervical radiculopathy. Concern about neurological complications following cervical spine manipulation appears to be justified. A large long-term prospective study is required to determine the scale of the hazard.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related articles in JRSM:

Author's response
Edzard Ernst
JRSM 2007 100: 447. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JRSMHome page
E. Ernst
Author's response
J R Soc Med, October 1, 2007; 100(10): 447 - 447.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
E Ernst
Adverse effects of spinal manipulation: a systematic review
J R Soc Med, July 1, 2007; 100(7): 330 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. Vohra, B. C. Johnston, K. Cramer, and K. Humphreys
Adverse Events Associated With Pediatric Spinal Manipulation: A Systematic Review
Pediatrics, January 1, 2007; 119(1): e275 - e283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
W-L Chen, C-H Chern, Y-L Wu, and C-H Lee
Vertebral artery dissection and cerebellar infarction following chiropractic manipulation
Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2006; 23(1): e01 - e01.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P. Cote, J. D. Cassidy, S. Haldeman, E. E. Ernst, M. I. Weintraub, W. S. Smith, and S. C. Johnston
Spinal manipulative therapy is an independent risk factor for vertebral artery dissection
Neurology, November 11, 2003; 61(9): 1314 - 1315.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
E. Ernst
The safety of massage therapy
Rheumatology, September 1, 2003; 42(9): 1101 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
E Ernst and M M Sran
Chiropractic spinal manipulation for back pain * Commentary
Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2003; 37(3): 195 - 196.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
E. Ernst
ERNST RESPONDS TO EVANS
Am J Public Health, April 1, 2003; 93(4): 523 - 523.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
E. Ernst
ERNST RESPONDS TO HURWITZ ET AL.
Am J Public Health, April 1, 2003; 93(4): 524 - 524.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. Ernst
Chiropractic
Ann Intern Med, October 15, 2002; 137(8): 701 - 701.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
E. Ernst
Chiropractic Care: Attempting a Risk-Benefit Analysis
Am J Public Health, October 1, 2002; 92(10): 1603 - 1604.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
E. Ernst
Spinal manipulation: Its safety is uncertain
Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 1, 2002; 166(1): 40 - 41.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. O. Di Duro and E. Ernst
Life-Threatening Complications From Spinal Manipulation Are Rare
Stroke, October 1, 2001; 32 (10): 2440 - 2440.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. L. Rosner
Re: Chiropractic Manipulation and Stroke
Stroke, September 1, 2001; 32(9): 2207 - 2208.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. S. Jeret and E. Ernst
More Complications of Spinal Manipulation Response
Stroke, August 1, 2001; 32 (8): 1936 - 1937.
[Full Text] [PDF]