JRSM > Volume 94, Number 7 > Pp. 331-332

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Send a Quick Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Quick Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ellis, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Medicolegal consequences of postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions

Harold Ellis CBE FRCS  

Human Sciences Research, King's College London, Hodgkin Building, Guy's Hospital Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK

Postoperative adhesions are an almost invariable consequence of abdominal and pelvic surgery. Their most important morbidity is small-bowel obstruction, but other sequelae include female infertility and dyspareunia and increased risk of visceral injury at subsequent laparotomy or laparoscopy. Whether chronic abdominal pain is truly a consequence of adhesions is debatable, although it is likely to be accepted as an entity by both patients and their legal advisors. Of 14 successful claims dealt with by a British medical defence organization, 5 were for perforations after laparoscopic division of adhesions, 2 for adhesions after laparoscopic surgery, 1 for infertility as a result of adhesions and 6 for delayed diagnosis of obstruction. General practitioners, surgeons and gynaecologists need to be aware of the increasing burden of medicolegal claims arising from these complications.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?