JRSM > Volume 95, Number 12 > Pp. 598-600

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Send a Quick Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Quick Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ramchandani, M. Articles by Kirkby, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Pooled cataract waiting lists: views of hospital consultants, general practitioners and patients

Mahesh Ramchandani MB FRCSEd   Salman Mirza MB FRCSEd   Ash Sharma MB FRCOphth     Graham Kirkby FRCS FRCOphth  

Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital NHS Trust, Dudley Rd, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK

Correspondence to: Mr Graham Kirkby

In the National Health Service general practitioners (GPs) usually refer patients to named consultants; thus, waiting times for a particular procedure can vary greatly even within a single centre. An alternative is to pool the waiting list, with patients treated in turn by the consultant available. We sought opinions on this strategy, from patients, GPs, and consultants, in relation to cataract surgery. Questionnaires were sent to 776 consultant ophthalmologists; telephone interviews were conducted with 50 randomly selected Birmingham GPs; and 85 Birmingham patients listed for cataract surgery were asked whether they would change consultant to be operated on sooner. 503 (64%) of the consultants responded.

Of consultants, 30% favoured pooled lists and 67% were against. Of patients, 82% favoured pooled lists and 18% were against. Of GPs, 92% favoured pooled lists and 8% were against. Some consultants thought that pooled lists were suitable for routine cases but not for more complex cases. 82% of patients expressed willingness to change consultant in order to get an earlier operation.

In units with surgeons whose cataract-surgery practices are similar, pooled lists are one way to maximize theatre use and equalize waiting times for routine cases. The model could be applied to other routine surgical procedures such as hip replacement, herniorrhaphy and prostatectomy.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Hodge, T. Horsley, D. Albiani, J. Baryla, M. Belliveau, R. Buhrmann, M. O'Connor, J. Blair, and E. Lowcock The consequences of waiting for cataract surgery: a systematic review Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 24, 2007; 176(9): 1285 - 1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Black Surgical waiting lists are inevitable: time to focus on work undertaken J R Soc Med, April 1, 2004; 97(4): 159 - 160. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Leach, S. Rutherford, A. King, and J. Leggate Generic waiting lists for routine spinal surgery J R Soc Med, March 1, 2004; 97(3): 119 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Jones Pooled waiting lists J R Soc Med, February 1, 2003; 96(2): 102 - 102. [Full Text] [PDF]

				How much do doctors know about consent and capacity? J R Soc Med, January 1, 2003; 96(1): 54 - 54. [Full Text] [PDF]