RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2002;95:604-605
doi:10.1258/jrsm.95.12.604
© 2002 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, H R H
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2002;95:604-605
© 2002 The Royal Society of Medicine

Outpatient clinic: where is the delay?

H R H Patel PhD MRCS   C N Luxman T S Bailey J D M Brunning D Zemmel L K Morrell MSc RGN   M S Nathan MS FRCS(Urol)     R A Miller MS FRCS  

Department of Urology and Minimal Access Surgery, Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, Highgate Hill, London N19 5NF, UK

Correspondence to: Mr H R H Patel E-mail: hrhpatel{at}hotmail.com

In outpatient clinics, consultation times are often eroded by extraneous activities. We measured the components of each outpatient episode in 167 patients attending a general urology follow-up clinic. 41% of time in the clinic was spent away from the patient—administration 17%, disturbances 15%, finding results 9%. The inefficiencies had changed little since a study in the same setting thirteen years earlier. Since then, parallel nurse-practitioner-run clinics have been introduced in the hope of giving consultants longer with the patient; however, time with each patient is now 4.8 min compared with a previous 7.6 min. The most easily addressed inefficiencies are those relating to missing information, such as radiology reports.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
P E Gilmore, D C Shackley, N W Clarke, C D Betts, and K J O'Flynn
National review of urology outpatient practice in the UK
Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2005; 81(951): 55 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, January 11, 2003; 326(7380): 112 - 112.
[Full Text] [PDF]