RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2002;95:126-129
doi:10.1258/jrsm.95.3.126
© 2002 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thakore, S
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2002;95:126-129
© 2002 The Royal Society of Medicine

Emergency ambulance dispatch: is there a case for triage?

S Thakore FRCSE DRCOG   E A McGugan FRCSG FRCSE     W Morrison FRCA FRCP  

Accident and Emergency Department, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK

Correspondence to: W Morrison, Consultant in accident and emergency. E-mail: william.g.morrison{at}tuht.scot.nhs.uk

Emergency telephone calls for an ambulance (999 calls) are usually dealt with first-come first-served. We have devised and assessed criteria that ambulance dispatch might use to prioritize responses. Data were collected retrospectively on consecutive patients presenting to an accident and emergency (A&E) department after a 999 call. An unblinded researcher abstracted data including age, date, time, caller, location, reason for call and A&E diagnosis and each case was examined for ten predetermined criteria necessitating an immediate ambulance response—namely, cardiac arrest; chest pain; shortness of breath; altered mental status/seizure; abdominal/loin pain >65 years old; fresh haematemesis; fall >2m; stabbing; major burns.

471 patients were recruited, 55% male, median age 50 years. 406 calls came from bystanders or the patients themselves, 36 from general practitioners, 8 from other hospitals and 21 from the police. 52% of patients were admitted. 44% met at least one of the above criteria.

Most patients did not meet the criteria for an immediate ambulance response but might nonetheless be suitable for an urgent response. The criteria used in this study have the advantage of being based on the history provided by the caller. The introduction of a priority-based dispatch system could reduce response times to those who are seriously ill, and also improve road safety.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
J T Gray and A Walker
Avoiding admissions from the ambulance service: a review of elderly patients with falls and patients with breathing difficulties seen by emergency care practitioners in South Yorkshire
Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2008; 25(3): 168 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Kober, T. Scheck, F. Tschabitscher, S. Wiltschnig, S. Sator-Katzenschlager, W. Madei, B. Gustorff, and K. Hoerauf
The Influence of Local Active Warming on Pain Relief of Patients with Cholelithiasis During Rescue Transport
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1447 - 1452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
P. Marks and T. Daniel
Emergency ambulance triage
J R Soc Med, January 5, 2002; 95(5): 270 - 270.
[Full Text] [PDF]