RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2002;95:343-347
doi:10.1258/jrsm.95.7.343
© 2002 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnett, M. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2002;95:343-347
© 2002 The Royal Society of Medicine

Effect of breaking bad news on patients' perceptions of doctors

Mandy M Barnett MD MRCGP  

Centre for Primary Health Care Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK

E-mail: m.m.barnett{at}warwick.ac.uk

The breaking of bad news is a routine but difficult task for many health professionals. There are numerous anecdotes of insensitive practice but the subject has attracted little systematic research. We therefore interviewed 106 patients with advanced cancer (from an original sample of 195) to assess their perceptions of the doctors involved in their care. Aspects of the ‘breaking bad news’ event were recorded during discussion of the illness history and were subsequently rated. Participants were also asked to nominate doctors under the headings ‘most helpful’ and ‘less helpful’, and completed standardized psychological screening questionnaires.

In 94 of the 106 cases the bad news had been given by a doctor, usually a surgeon. Of the 13 doctors categorized as ‘most helpful’ when breaking bad news, 8 were general practitioners; of the 7 categorized as ‘less helpful’ all were surgeons. 69% of patients were neutral or positive about the bad-news consultation, but 20% were negative and 6% very negative. Doctors in surgical specialties were significantly more likely to be rated poorly than non-surgical specialists or general practitioners.

Surgeons were the group of doctors most likely to break bad news, but non-surgical doctors were rated more positively in performance of the task. This finding has implications for training.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
F. Goncalves, A. Marques, S. Rocha, P. Leitao, T. Mesquita, and S. Moutinho
Breaking bad news: experiences and preferences of advanced cancer patients at a Portuguese oncology centre
Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2005; 19(7): 526 - 531.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
R. G. Hagerty, P. N. Butow, P. M. Ellis, S. Dimitry, and M. H. N. Tattersall
Communicating prognosis in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2005; 16(7): 1005 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
M. Patterson
Breaking bad news
J R Soc Med, January 10, 2002; 95(10): 526 - 526.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Acute CT - A Primer of Emergency Imaging