RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2003;96:547-548
doi:10.1258/jrsm.96.11.547
© 2003 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C S
Right arrow Articles by McCormick, P A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2003;96:547-548
© 2003 The Royal Society of Medicine

Telephone reminders to reduce non-attendance rate for endoscopy

C S Lee MRCPI     P A McCormick MD FRCP  

Department of Gastroenterology, St Michael's Hospital, Dun Laoire, Co Dublin, Republic of Ireland

Correspondence to: Dr C S Lee, Liver Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland E-mail: chunsenglee{at}eircom.net

Non-attendance at clinics and endoscopy units wastes resources and lengthens waiting lists. In a previous study elsewhere, a substantial proportion of patients claimed to have forgotten their appointment. We therefore assessed the value of telephoning patients a week before their booked day-case endoscopy. An observation period of two months was followed by an intervention period of two months in which patients were contacted by phone and asked if they wished to come for their investigation. A maximum of three separate attempts were made to contact each patient. Patients cancelling the appointment were replaced by others on the reserve list. The non-attendance rate was expressed as the percentage of unused beds.

During the observation period 56 patients were admitted and 18 beds were unused. During the intervention period it was possible to contact 73 of 88 patients and 8 of these cancelled. 87 beds were available and 83 patients were admitted. When clerical error, overbooking and failure to replace patients were taken into account, the non-attendance rate declined from 23.3% during the observation period to 5.7% during the intervention period (P<0.05). The intervention seemed more effective in reducing non-attendance in outpatients referrals (0/48) than in general practitioner referrals (5/40).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J STD AIDSHome page
C E Cohen, K M Coyne, S Mandalia, A-M Waters, and A K Sullivan
Time to use text reminders in genitourinary medicine clinics
Int J STD AIDS, January 1, 2008; 19(1): 12 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
N. Black
Surgical waiting lists are inevitable: time to focus on work undertaken
J R Soc Med, April 1, 2004; 97(4): 159 - 160.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, November 15, 2003; 327(7424): 1176 - 1176.
[Full Text] [PDF]