JRSM > Volume 96, Number 12 > Pp. 586-588

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Send a Quick Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Quick Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rai, S Articles by Thomas, W M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis: the importance of laparoscopy

S Rai MS FRCS     W M Thomas MD FRCS  

Department of General Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK

Correspondence to: Mr Sajal Rai, 27 Hambledon Drive, Wollaton, Nottingham NG8 1LG, UKE-mail: sajal_rai{at}hotmail.com

Abdominal tuberculosis (TB) tends to present with non-specific features and can be hard to diagnose. In the University Hospitals of Leicester, which serve a large immigrant population, 36 patients had this diagnosis between 1995 and 2001. We examined their records to identify features, including history, clinical presentation, investigations and diagnostic procedures, that might help with diagnosis of future cases.

32 of the patients were of Asian origin, predominantly from the Indian subcontinent. The most common presenting complaints were abdominal pain and weight loss. On clinical examination the findings were non-specific. Only 2 patients were found to have concurrent pulmonary TB. The most consistent laboratory finding (>90%) was a low haemoglobin with a raised C-reactive protein. The tuberculin test (Mantoux) was positive in only 7 patients (22%), and Ziehl–Neelsen staining of ascitic fluid was negative in all 11 patients in whom it was examined. An ultrasound scan of the abdomen revealed findings consistent with TB in 9/28 patients and a CT scan was helpful in 6/11. Laparoscopy, although usually performed as a last resort, proved the most effective investigation, yielding the diagnosis in 23 (92%) of the 25 patients in whom it was performed.

In patients with the relevant background and clinical history, laparoscopy is the investigation of choice.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Ramesh, G.S. Banait, and L.P. Ormerod Abdominal tuberculosis in a district general hospital: a retrospective review of 86 cases QJM, March 1, 2008; 101(3): 189 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Petrou, V. Vassiliou, S Rai, and W M Thomas Diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis * Authors' reply J R Soc Med, March 1, 2004; 97(3): 155 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D Singh-Ranger Diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis J R Soc Med, March 1, 2004; 97(3): 154 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P A Whitehouse Diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis J R Soc Med, March 1, 2004; 97(3): 155 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF]