RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2003;96:180-184
doi:10.1258/jrsm.96.4.180
© 2003 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lings, P.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2003;96:180-184
© 2003 The Royal Society of Medicine

The doctor—patient relationship in US primary care

Pam Lings PhD   Philip Evans MPhil MRCGP   David Seamark PhD MRCGP   Clare Seamark MPhil MRCGP   Kieran Sweeney MPhil FRCGP   Michael Dixon OBE FRCGP     Denis Pereira Gray FRCGP FMedSci  

Institute of General Practice (now the Peninsula Medical School), School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Pam Lings E-mail: pam.lings{at}pms.ac.uk

Changes in the organization of primary care in the UK are driven by a need to improve access and availability, but doctor—patient relationships may suffer. To investigate the importance of such relationships in a different setting, we analysed focus-group data obtained in a primary care facility in the USA (Rochester, NY). The findings pointed to three key factors in these relationships—namely, an asymmetry of perceptions on the two sides, belying the notion of a meeting of experts; the importance on both sides of ‘liking’; and the value set by both parties on development of trust. The last two of these factors are probably related to continuity of care, now under threat.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
N. Pandhi and J. W. Saultz
Patients' perceptions of interpersonal continuity of care.
J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2006; 19(4): 390 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
A. Kubacki
What's important in the doctor-patient relationship?
J R Soc Med, June 1, 2003; 96(6): 314 - 314.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Acute CT - A Primer of Emergency Imaging