JRSM > Volume 96, Number 7 > Pp. 338-342

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Send a Quick Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Quick Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Magee, H. Articles by Coulter, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Public views on healthcare performance indicators and patient choice

Helen Magee BA   Lucy-Jane Davis MSc     Angela Coulter PhD  

Picker Institute Europe, King's Mead House, Oxpens Road, Oxford OX1 1RX, UK

Correspondence to: Angela CoulterE-mail: angela.coulter{at}pickereurope.ac.uk

Patients on certain waiting lists in the UK National Health Service (NHS) are now offered the choice of persevering with their home hospital or switching to another hospital where they will be treated on a guaranteed date. Such decisions require knowledge of performance. We used facilitated focus groups to investigate the views of patients and members of the public on publication of information about the performance of healthcare providers. Six groups with a total of 50 participants met in six different locations in England.

Participants felt that independent monitoring of healthcare performance is necessary, but they were ambivalent about the value of performance indicators and hospital rankings. They tended to distrust government information and preferred the presentational style of 'Dr Foster', a commercial information provider, because it gave more detailed locally relevant information. Many participants felt the NHS did not offer much scope for choice of provider.

If public access to performance information is to succeed in informing referral decisions and raising quality standards, the public and general practitioners will need education on how to interpret and use the data.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Conner-Spady PhD, C. Sanmartin PhD, G. Johnston MD MBA, J. McGurran MSc, M. Kehler MA, and T. Noseworthy MD MPH Willingness of patients to change surgeons for a shorter waiting time for joint arthroplasty Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 12, 2008; 179(4): 327 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Singleton Data sources and performance measurement BMJ, October 13, 2007; 335(7623): 730 - 730. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. H Zaidi, M. C Corbett, B. J L Burton, and P. A Bloom Raising the benchmark for the 21st century--the 1000 cataract operations audit and survey: outcomes, Consultant-supervised training and sourcing NHS choice Br J Ophthalmol, June 1, 2007; 91(6): 731 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Coulter What do patients and the public want from primary care? BMJ, November 19, 2005; 331(7526): 1199 - 1201. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M Schwartz, S. Woloshin, and J. D Birkmeyer How do elderly patients decide where to go for major surgery? Telephone interview survey BMJ, October 8, 2005; 331(7520): 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. McKee Not everything that counts can be counted; not everything that can be counted counts BMJ, January 17, 2004; 328(7432): 153 - 153. [Full Text] [PDF]