JRSM > Volume 96, Number 8 > Pp. 398-399

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Send a Quick Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Quick Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Subramonian, K R Articles by Mufti, G R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

How will the two-weeks-wait rule affect delays in management of urological cancers?

K R Subramonian FRCS   S Puranik MBBS     G R Mufti MCh FRCS  

Department of Urology, Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK

Correspondence to: Mr G R Mufti E-mail: gr.mufti-urology{at}medway.nhs.uk

The UK National Health Service has now specified a maximum interval of two weeks between general practitioner (GP) referral and specialist assessment for patients with suspected cancer. We examined progress through the cancer pathway in 160 patients with potentially curable cancers of the prostate, bladder, kidney and testis before implementation of this rule. Median intervals with interquartile ranges were quantified from the first GP consultation to hospital referral, then to the first hospital consultation, confirmation of diagnosis and definitive surgery.

34% of patients were seen at the hospital within two weeks of referral. The overall median interval from GP consultation to radical surgery was 137 days, the longest being for prostate cancer (median 244). For prostate, bladder and renal cancers the principal element of delay was from the time of diagnosis to surgery (76, 73 and 26 days respectively).

These results indicate that, under the two-weeks-wait rule, 2 out of every 3 patients achieve earlier initial assessment. However, the overall delay will not be substantially reduced without concomitant increases in diagnostic facilities, theatre time and human resources.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A J Larner Referral guidelines for suspected central nervous system or brain tumours. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2006; 77(12): 1305 - 1306. [Full Text] [PDF]