RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2004;97:480-482
doi:10.1258/jrsm.97.10.480
© 2004 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ranjith, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hotopf, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2004;97:480-482
© 2004 The Royal Society of Medicine

‘Refusing treatment—please see’: an analysis of capacity assessments carried out by a liaison psychiatry service

Gopinath Ranjith MRCPsych  1   Matthew Hotopf PhD MRCPsych  2

1 Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College Hospital, London
2 Section of General Hospital Psychiatry, Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF, UK

Correspondence to: Dr M Hotopf, Department of Psychological Medicine, 3rd Floor, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, UK E-mail: m.hotopf{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk

The assessment of capacity to consent to a healthcare decision is an important part of day-to-day work in general hospitals. The role of liaison psychiatric services in assessment of capacity has not been well studied in British practice. We looked at all such referrals (35) to a liaison psychiatric service in a teaching hospital in the course of one year.

The commonest referrals were regarding capacity to consent to a therapeutic procedure, followed by post-discharge placement and ability to self-discharge. Organic mental disorders were the most frequent cause of incapacity. 20 (57%) of the referrals were for patients who had refused the intervention in question, and in 12 of these the contentious issue was resolved.

Liaison psychiatric services can be useful not only in offering a second opinion or clarifying the influence of psychopathology on decision-making ability but also mediating between the patient and the clinical team.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The PsychiatristHome page
I. Sawhney, A. Mukhopadhyay, and C. Karki
Mental Capacity Act 2005: views and experiences of learning disability psychiatrists
The Psychiatrist, June 1, 2009; 33(6): 234 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
T. R J Nicholson, W. Cutter, and M. Hotopf
Assessing mental capacity: the Mental Capacity Act
BMJ, February 9, 2008; 336(7639): 322 - 325.
[Full Text] [PDF]