RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2004;97:326-327
doi:10.1258/jrsm.97.7.326
© 2004 Royal Society of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elmiyeh, B
Right arrow Articles by Alshafi, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2004;97:326-327
© 2004 The Royal Society of Medicine

Needle-stick injuries in the National Health Service: a culture of silence

B Elmiyeh MRCS  1 I S Whitaker MA MB  1 M J James FRCS FRCS (Plast)  2 C A A Chahal MB BSc  5 A Galea MD AFRCS(Ed)  3   K Alshafi FRCPath  4

1 Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge
2 Department of Plastic, Lister Hospital, Stevenage
3 Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Lister Hospital, Stevenage
4 Department of Microbiology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage
5 Department of Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK

Correspondence to: Dr I S Whitaker, 3 Magellan House, Armouries Way, Leeds LS10 1JE, UK
E-mail: Iain_Whitaker{at}yahoo.com

Injury by contaminated sharp instruments and needles constitutes a major occupational hazard for healthcare workers. In a confidential survey at a district general hospital, 300 healthcare professionals were asked about their personal experience of needle-stick injury and their attitudes to reporting.

279 individuals responded, of whom 38% had experienced at least one needle-stick (mean 1.8) in the past year and 74% had sustained such an injury during their careers (mean 3.0). Although 80% of respondents were aware that such incidents should be notified, only 51% of those affected had reported all needle-stick injuries. Doctors were less likely to report than nurses, despite a higher liability to injury.

This survey adds to evidence of a culture of silence pertaining to needle-stick injuries. The consequent risks to health, and the ethical and financial implications, remain uncertain.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
A. Elder and C. Paterson
Sharps injuries in UK health care: a review of injury rates, viral transmission and potential efficacy of safety devices
Occup. Med., December 1, 2006; 56(8): 566 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
E. L. Altschuler
A one-handed method for obtaining arterial blood
J R Soc Med, October 1, 2004; 97(10): 505 - 505.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
Needle-stick injuries in the National Health Service: a culture of silence
J R Soc Med, September 1, 2004; 97(9): 458 - 458.
[Full Text]



Recent Advances in Otolaryngology 8