JRSM > Volume 98, Number 3 > Pp. 111-113

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Send a Quick Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Quick Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JRSM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wong, W. C W Articles by Dickinson, J. A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Reliability of automated blood pressure devices used by hypertensive patients

William C W Wong MB MRCGP  ¹ Ivan K L Shiu MB BS  ² Thomas M T Hwong MB FRCS  ³   James A Dickinson PhD FRACGP  ⁴

¹ Department of Community and Family Medicine, 4th Floor, School of Public Health, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
² Lek Yuen Medical Centre, Shatin
³ Cardiothoracic Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin
⁴ Family Medicine, University of Calgary, UCMC North Hill 1707, Alberta-Calgary T2N 1M7, Canada

Correspondence to: Dr William C Wong E-mail: cwwong{at}cuhk.edu.hk

Automated blood pressure (BP) devices are used by many hypertensive patients in Hong Kong, with or without medical advice. At two community clinics, we invited hypertensive patients aged between 40 and 70 years who used such a device to fill in a questionnaire and to have four sets of BP measurements, automated and mercury, at two visits. Of 290 hypertensive patients 120 fulfilled the criteria, and 73 of these agreed to participate.

53 devices measured arm BP, 21 measured forearm BP. The agreement between the mercury sphygmomanometer and the automated devices was poor, with average differences of 9.5 mmHg for systolic and 9.4 mmHg for diastolic and no clear advantage for either site of measurement. As a means of screening for BP >140/90 mmHg the sensitivity of the automated devices was 81% and the specificity was 80%. There were large variations in how often and under what circumstances the devices had been used. One-fifth of the devices had been acquired on medical advice but only 11% of the participants were aware of the three important conditions for operating such devices.

Discussion of automated devices, their role and proper use, should now be part of routine hypertensive care.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related articles in JRSM:

Goodbye mercury? Blood pressure measurement and its future

George I Varughese and Gregory Y H Lip
JRSM 2005 98: 89-90. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Minerva BMJ, March 12, 2005; 330(7491): 608 - 608. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. I Varughese and G. Y H Lip Goodbye mercury? Blood pressure measurement and its future J R Soc Med, March 1, 2005; 98(3): 89 - 90. [Full Text] [PDF]