JRSM > Volume 98, Number 4 > Pp. 153-157

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Send a Quick Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Quick Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Raine, R. Articles by Black, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

'Referral into a void': opinions of general practitioners and others on single point of access to mental health care

Rosalind Raine MB BS PhD  ¹ Simon Carter PhD  ¹ Tom Sensky MD  ²   Nick Black MD FFPH  ¹

¹ Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT
² Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 6AF, UK

Correspondence to: Dr R Raine E-mail: rosalind.raine{at}lshtm.ac.uk

In the past, British general practitioners (GPs) have referred patients to individual consultants. There is now a trend towards generic referral, whereby the specialist team is consulted via a single point of access. We examined the impact of this innovation on the relationship between GPs and specialists in mental health care. Sixteen groups of randomly selected GPs and mental health professionals (MHPs) in England discussed clinical scenarios involving the use of mental health interventions for patients with functional somatic symptoms. The meetings were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed to the point at which no major new themes were emerging. The final analysis was confined to a purposive sample of six of the sixteen groups, comprising 54 GPs and 15 MHPs.

Although the rationale for the single point of access was clear to both GPs and MHPs, the approach erected boundaries because it impeded the establishment of professional relationships and transfer of knowledge. GPs thought the system reduced their capacity to be accountable to their patients and limited the potential for their own professional development. MHPs did not seem to be aware of GPs' concerns.

Effective interprofessional management of individual patients depends upon confidence in colleagues' skills and good communication. Factors that hamper these must be addressed in the development of this system of referral.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Chew-Graham, M. Slade, C. Montana, M. Stewart, and L. Gask Loss of doctor-to-doctor communication: lessons from the reconfiguration of mental health services in England J Health Serv Res Policy, January 1, 2008; 13(1): 6 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]