RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2006;99:65-72
doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.2.65
© 2006 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slowther, A.
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2006;99:65-72
© 2006 The Royal Society of Medicine

Series

Research governance: ethical issues

Anne Slowther1 Petra Boynton2   Sara Shaw3

1 Clinical Research Fellow, Ethox Centre Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF
2 Lecturer, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, London N19 5LW, UK
3 Senior Research Fellow, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, London N19 5LW, UK

Correspondence to: Sara Shaw
E-mail: s.shaw{at}pcps.ucl.ac.uk

SUMMARY

Healthcare research is haunted by a history of unethical studies in which profound harm was caused to vulnerable individuals. Official systems for gaining ethical approval for research, designed to prevent a repetition of these shameful examples, can prove bureaucratic and inflexible in practice. The core ethical principles of respect for autonomy, prevention of harm, promotion of benefit, and justice (which form the basis of professional codes of research conduct) must be applied flexibly to take account of contextual, methodological, personal and practical considerations. Ensuring that the design and conduct of all research is ethically sound is the responsibility of all involved—including researchers, research institutions, ethics review committees and regulatory bodies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JRSMHome page
T. Kielmann, A. Tierney, R. Porteous, G. Huby, A. Sheikh, and H. Pinnock
The Department of Health's research governance framework remains an impediment to multi-centre studies: findings from a national descriptive study
J R Soc Med, May 1, 2007; 100(5): 234 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
R. A.-S. Salman, T. M Brock, M. S Dennis, P. A G Sandercock, P. M White, and C. Warlow
Research governance impediments to clinical trials: a retrospective survey
J R Soc Med, February 1, 2007; 100(2): 101 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



MDU Exam Doctor