Series |
1 Clinical Research Fellow, Ethox Centre Department of Public Health and Primary
Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF
2 Lecturer, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University
College London, London N19 5LW, UK
3 Senior Research Fellow, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences,
University College London, London N19 5LW, UK
Correspondence to: Sara Shaw
E-mail:
s.shaw{at}pcps.ucl.ac.uk
SUMMARY
Healthcare research is haunted by a history of unethical studies in which profound harm was caused to vulnerable individuals. Official systems for gaining ethical approval for research, designed to prevent a repetition of these shameful examples, can prove bureaucratic and inflexible in practice. The core ethical principles of respect for autonomy, prevention of harm, promotion of benefit, and justice (which form the basis of professional codes of research conduct) must be applied flexibly to take account of contextual, methodological, personal and practical considerations. Ensuring that the design and conduct of all research is ethically sound is the responsibility of all involvedincluding researchers, research institutions, ethics review committees and regulatory bodies.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Kielmann, A. Tierney, R. Porteous, G. Huby, A. Sheikh, and H. Pinnock The Department of Health's research governance framework remains an impediment to multi-centre studies: findings from a national descriptive study J R Soc Med, May 1, 2007; 100(5): 234 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A.-S. Salman, T. M Brock, M. S Dennis, P. A G Sandercock, P. M White, and C. Warlow Research governance impediments to clinical trials: a retrospective survey J R Soc Med, February 1, 2007; 100(2): 101 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||