JRSM >
Volume 99, Number 4 >
Pp. 192-196
Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter & Plymouth, 25 Victoria Park Road, Exeter EX2 4NT, UK
Correspondence to: Professor E Ernst
E-mail:
Edzard.Ernst{at}pms.ac.uk
Objectives: To systematically collate and evaluate the evidence from recent systematic reviews of clinical trials of spinal manipulation.
Design: Literature searches were carried out in four electronic databases for all systematic reviews of the effectiveness of spinal manipulation in any indication, published between 2000 and May 2005. Reviews were defined as systematic if they included an explicit and repeatable inclusion and exclusion criteria for studies.
Results: Sixteen papers were included relating to the following conditions: back pain (n=3), neck pain (n=2), lower back pain and neck pain (n=1), headache (n=3), non-spinal pain (n=1), primary and secondary dysmenorrhoea (n=1), infantile colic (n=1), asthma (n=1), allergy (n=1), cervicogenic dizziness (n=1), and any medical problem (n=1). The conclusions of these reviews were largely negative, except for back pain where spinal manipulation was considered superior to sham manipulation but not better than conventional treatments.
Conclusions: Collectively these data do not demonstrate that spinal manipulation is an effective intervention for any condition. Given the possibility of adverse effects, this review does not suggest that spinal manipulation is a recommendable treatment.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
Related articles in JRSM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P Juni, M Battaglia, E Nuesch, G Hammerle, P Eser, R van Beers, D Vils, J Bernhard, H-R Ziswiler, M Dahler, et al. A randomised controlled trial of spinal manipulative therapy in acute low back pain Ann Rheum Dis, September 1, 2009; 68(9): 1420 - 1427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Ernst Chiropractic for paediatric conditions: substantial evidence? BMJ, July 9, 2009; 339(jul08_4): b2766 - b2766. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. P. Rathmell A 50-Year-Old Man With Chronic Low Back Pain JAMA, May 7, 2008; 299(17): 2066 - 2077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. J Lewis Adverse effects of spinal manipulation J R Soc Med, October 1, 2007; 100(10): 444 - 444. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E Ernst Adverse effects of spinal manipulation: a systematic review J R Soc Med, July 1, 2007; 100(7): 330 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Fitzpatrick Complementary and alternative medicine: why I'm opposed to integration Perspectives in Public Health, September 1, 2006; 126(5): 207 - 208. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Breen, S. Vogel, T. Pincus, N. Foster, M. Underwood, and The Musculoskeletal Process of Care Collaboration Systematic review of spinal manipulation: A balanced review of evidence? J R Soc Med, June 1, 2006; 99(6): 277 - 277. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B J Lewis and G Carruthers Systematic review of spinal manipulation: A biased report. J R Soc Med, June 1, 2006; 99(6): 278 - 278. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E Ernst and P Canter Systematic review of spinal manipulation: Authors' reply. J R Soc Med, June 1, 2006; 99(6): 279 - 280. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Byfield and P. McCarthy Systematic review of spinal manipulation: Flaws in the review. J R Soc Med, June 1, 2006; 99(6): 277 - 278. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. J. Hakim, G. P.R. Clunie, and I. Haq Physical and ‘hands on’ therapies Oxford Handbook of Rheumatology, January 1, 2006; 2(1): med-9780198571353-div1-13 - med-9780198571353-div1-13. [Full Text]
|
|
