RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2006;99:178-182
doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178
© 2006 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Quick Comments: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals

Richard Smith

You have reached the most complete version of this article accessible without further authentication.
More complete versions are available.
Link to article

Article topics:


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Infect. Immun.Home page
A. Casadevall and F. C. Fang
Is Peer Review Censorship?
Infect. Immun., April 1, 2009; 77(4): 1273 - 1274.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
W. P. Cooney III
Acknowledging Our Reviewers
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., December 1, 2006; 14(13): 703 - 704.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JRSMHome page
R. Smith
Lapses at the new England journal of medicine.
J R Soc Med, August 1, 2006; 99(8): 380 - 382.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JRSMHome page
B. Lush
Peer review: Unreliable reviewers.
J R Soc Med, August 1, 2006; 99(8): 385 - 385.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JRSMHome page
R H S Carpenter
Peer review: Peerless review.
J R Soc Med, August 1, 2006; 99(8): 384 - 385.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Quick Comments:

Read all Quick Comments

A test of peer review or just a slip of the fingers?
David M. Richerby
JRSM Online, 8 May 2009 [Full text]
Carpaccio was a painter and a fine one
Richard Smith
JRSM Online, 11 May 2009 [Full text]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Quick Comments: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

MDU Exam Doctor

 Secrets of Success series International Journal of Care Pathways