RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2007;100:531
doi:10.1258/jrsm.100.12.531
© 2007 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JRSM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abbasi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2007;100:531
© 2007 The Royal Society of Medicine

Why medicine is like philosophy

Kamran Abbasi

Editor, JRSM [Kamran.abbasi{at}rsm.ac.uk]

‘Is not medicine the science of health?’ asked Plato. Not quite, if you fully consider this month's JRSM, an issue published a century after the rebirth of the Royal Society of Medicine in its current form. December offers an opportunity to contemplate the deeper questions of clinical practice, and my take-home message for the holiday season is that medicine is more comfortable and more fascinating as a science and an art.

Jane Roberts begins the issue with a feminist critique of the Spice Girls and ends with a plea for academia to recognize that women have a dual role as doctors and engaged, responsible parents (JRSM 2007;100:532-3 and 583-4). Family friendly policies, she argues, have no real currency in the world of academic medicine. Indeed, why should the emotional well being of children of doctors be ignored? What does this say for our society, other than it is in a perilous state?

The hegemonic medical structure that Roberts describes was even more evident a century ago when the Royal Society of Medicine first appeared in its current form with academic sections, and when Dr Gee, the president of the medical section, invoked the vision that Boethius saw in his prison in Pavia: Philosophy appearing before him in the form of a majestic woman, clad in an imperishable robe she had woven, but the beauty of her vesture ruined by violent hands tearing away as much as each could clutch. The many sects and sections of philosophy, argued Dr Gee in 1907, were the mirror of medicine (JRSM 2007;100:535).

John Scadding, the current Academic Dean of the RSM, considers Dr Gee's analysis in a modern light and concludes that Dr Gee's concerns about the fragmentation of medicine are relevant today and will still be of importance in a hundred years time, just as the role of the RSM in medical education remains unchanged and will continue to remain so (JRSM 2007;100:536-7).

One important difference, however, is technology and the challenge it poses to traditional clinical skills. In a throwback to the life and times of Dr Gee, Kartick Thirukkanesan and colleagues present the case for cardiac percussion in the diagnosis of cardiorespiratory disorder (JRSM 2007;100:533-4). They argue that area-based dullness can be useful in the diagnosis of atrial enlargement and right ventricular hypertrophy or dilation. A generation of doctors brought up on ECGs, chest X rays and echocardiograms might be hard to persuade, although many doctors do still enjoy the thrill of making a diagnosis without artificial assistance.

Another important clinical skill is diagnosing death. In one of my junior doctor posts, a colleague certified the death of one her patients, called in the family, who were only too delighted to find their relative sitting up sipping a cup of tea when they arrived in hospital. I had assumed this was sheer bad luck—or good luck depending on your perspective—until I read this month's review on the Lazarus phenomenon, described as a delayed return of spontaneous circulation after cessation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (JRSM 2007;100:552-7).

The story of Lazarus tells of how he was resurrected by Christ four days after his death, which leads us back to the art and science of medicine in this seasonal issue of the JRSM—and the futility of doctors. Bernadette O'Hare and David Southall demonstrate an association between recent conflict and higher rates of under-5 mortality, malnutrition and maternal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa (JRSM 2007;100:564-70), while Mike Clarke and colleagues prove—probably not beyond reasonable doubt—that the status of the signatory of a letter has no effect on the likelihood or promptness of response, not even if that status was conferred by the British monarch (JRSM 2007;100:571-2). Apologies for finishing on a negative note for all of you expecting letters from the Queen, but the rest of us will take pleasure from this conclusion—and, I hope, from the rest of this month's issue.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related articles in JRSM:

On our own terms
Jane H Roberts
JRSM 2007 100: 532-533. [Full Text]  

Experience of the area-based dullness method of cardiac percussion in the diagnosis of cardiorespiratory disorder
Kartick Thirukkanesan, Jaykar R Panchmatia, and Vivek Gulati
JRSM 2007 100: 533-534. [Full Text]  

Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine Medical Section 22 October 1907 Dr Gee, President of the Section, in the Chair

JRSM 2007 100: 535. [Full Text]  

A contemporary reflection on Dr Gee's introduction to the first Medical Section meeting in 1907
John Scadding
JRSM 2007 100: 536-537. [Full Text]  

The Lazarus phenomenon
Vedamurthy Adhiyaman, Sonja Adhiyaman, and Radha Sundaram
JRSM 2007 100: 552-557. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

First do no harm: the impact of recent armed conflict on maternal and child health in Sub-Saharan Africa
Bernadette A M O'Hare and David P Southall
JRSM 2007 100: 564-570. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Yes Sir, no Sir, not much difference Sir
Mike Clarke, Lorcan Clarke, and Thomas Clarke
JRSM 2007 100: 571-572. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Brave new world: a reflection on the life's work of John Fry and its link to General Practice in the 21st century
Jane H Roberts
JRSM 2007 100: 583-584. [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JRSM
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abbasi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Walking London's Medical History