RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2002;95:552-553
doi:10.1258/jrsm.95.11.552
© 2002 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, P.
Right arrow Articles by Stanbridge, R. D. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2002;95:552-553
© 2002 The Royal Society of Medicine

Treatment of long-duration atrial fibrillation by modified maze procedure

Pankaj Kumar FRCS   Thanos Athanasiou MD     Rex De L Stanbridge FRCS  

Department of Cardiac Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK

Correspondence to: Mr P Kumar, 43 Blenheim Gardens, Kingston, Surrey KT2 7BN, UK E-mail: pankajkumar66{at}hotmail.com

Atrial fibrillation is the commonest sustained cardiac arrhythmia, with a prevalence of about 10% in the over-70s1. The implications in terms of mortality, stroke and quality of life are of major concern. Patients have been successfully treated by surgical interruption of conduction pathways—the maze procedure. Lately a saline-irrigated radiofrequency probe, Cardioblate, has become available in the UK for this purpose.

CASE 1

A man aged 71 with rheumatic mitral disease and coronary artery disease had been in atrial fibrillation since the age of 22—i.e. for 49 years. He underwent off-pump triple coronary artery bypass grafting; then, after institution of cardiopulmonary bypass, the mitral valve was repaired with an annuloplasty ring and a modified maze procedure was performed with the irrigated radiofrequency probe. On discontinuation of cardiopulmonary bypass the heart was initially in nodal rhythm but soon the atria started beating and sinus rhythm was restored (Figure 1). The total ablation time was 5 minutes 8 seconds. The patient was in sinus rhythm four months post-operatively.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Preoperative (a) and postoperative (b) electrocardiograms in case 1

 

CASE 2

A woman of 67 with rheumatic mitral stenosis had been in atrial fibrillation since the age of 45—i.e. for 22 years. She underwent mitral valve replacement together with a modified maze procedure with the irrigated radiofrequency probe. At the end of the procedure both atria were beating, with the heart in sinus rhythm. Total ablation time was 3 minutes and 22 seconds. She was in sinus rhythm when seen six months postoperatively.

COMMENT

The maze procedure, as usually practised, entails a series of incisions in the left and right atrium to achieve electrical isolation and block the re-entry pathway. Maze III is very effective, with sinus rhythm and atrial contractility restored long term in more than 90% of patients2. It is, however, a difficult and long procedure with substantial morbidity.

The radiofrequency probe offers a shorter and simpler procedure, creating a full-thickness burn in the atrium. By use of saline irrigation the tip is constantly cooled so that resistive heating is directed several millimetres below the surface. The depth of the lesion can be varied depending on the power applied, the irrigation speed, the electrode diameter, and the delivery time. Nakagawa et al.3 report that this method produces larger and deeper lesions than ‘dry’ radiofrequency ablation. This has advantages in terms of speed, but does entail a risk of injury to deeper structures: Mohr et al.4 reported oesophageal injury in 1.3%.

The success rate of the modified maze (restoration of sinus rhythm with atrial contractility) was reported by Sie et al.5 as 90% at one year, 86% at two years and 75% at three years5. Benussi et al.6 reported 77% at a mean follow-up of 11.6 months. To the best of our knowledge the maze III operation has not been compared directly with the modified maze.

We are now recruiting more patients to assess the efficacy of this approach. Whilst at present surgical ablation is being used in patients requiring cardiac surgery for other reasons, the method may in future be applicable to a wider group.

REFERENCES

  1. Feinberg WM, Blackshear JL, Laupacis A, Kronmal R, Hart RG. Prevalence, age, distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med1995; 155:469 -73[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Cox JL, Ad N, Palazzo T, et al. Current status of the maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Semin Thorac Cardiovas Surg2000; 12:15 -19

  3. Nakagawa H, Yamanashi WS, Pitha JV, et al. Comparison of in vivo tissue temperature profile and lesion geometry for radiofrequency ablation with a saline-irrigated electrode versus temperature control in a canine thigh muscle preparation. Circulation1995; 91:2264 -73[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Mohr FW, Fabricius AM, Falk V, et al. Curative treatment of atrial fibrillation with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation: short-term and midterm results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2002; 123:919 -27[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Sie HT, Beukema WP, Misier AR, et al. Radiofrequency modified maze in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2001; 122:249 -56[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Benussi S, Pappone C, Nascimbene S, et al. A simple way to treat chronic atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery: the epicardial radiofrequency approach. Europ J Cardiothorac Surg2000; 17:524 -9


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, P.
Right arrow Articles by Stanbridge, R. D. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

How Not to be a Doctor