RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2002;95:580-586
doi:10.1258/jrsm.95.12.580
© 2002 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2002;95:580-586
© 2002 The Royal Society of Medicine

Supporting individuals with disabling multiple sclerosis

Jeremy Gibson MRCGP     Andrew Frank FRCP  1

Alderbourne Rehabilitation Unit, Hillingdon Hospital, Pield Heath Road, Hillingdon UB8 3NN, UK
1 Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow HA1 3UJ, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Jeremy Gibson E-mail: jeremygibson{at}doctors.org.uk


    INTRODUCTION
Go to previous sectionTOP
 INTRODUCTION
Go to next sectionDIAGNOSIS
Go to next sectionMANAGEMENT OF DISABLING SYMPTOMS
Go to next sectionPSYCHOSOCIAL PROBLEMS
Go to next sectionCOMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR THOSE...
Go to next sectionROLE OF THE MS...
Go to next sectionASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
Go to next sectionAPPENDIX 1: USEFUL ADDRESSES
Go to next sectionREFERENCES
 
People with disabling multiple sclerosis (MS) can lead rewarding and fulfilling lives. To this end, they will do best if they adjust early to the diagnosis and its implications, if disabling symptoms are kept to a minimum and if they get all possible support (including the use of assistive technology) from both professional and voluntary sectors. Support may be needed by those whose disability is static, those who have relapsed and those whose course is progressive. This review explores how this can sometimes be achieved.

The diagnosis of MS is a devastating event for individuals, their families and friends1,2. Its unpredictable course creates difficulties for psychological adjustment and for planning appropriate support3. The development of new disease-modifying drugs seems to have reduced relapse rates for some but may not alter long-term disability. Advice regarding the use of disease-modifying agents is beyond the scope of this review but has recently been distributed in the UK4. Only a small proportion of people with MS proceed to severe disability, many remaining independent 20 years or longer after diagnosis. However, subsequent progression to more severe disabilities is the experience of many. Rehabilitation is effective in reducing ‘disability and handicap’5 and ‘disability’6 and is an essential part of management1.

Living with MS typically is complicated by3:

As traditional medicine aims to provide ‘disease intervention’, many doctors feel ill equipped to help those with an incurable disease3. Much, however, can be done to help; and, because of the diversity of cognitive, physical, psychological and social problems experienced, rehabilitation requires a coordinated multiagency approach by health and social services3,7 including:

Consequently, matching the individual's needs to relevant services is crucial to the success of rehabilitation with different services needed, for example, to restore function after a relapse, to facilitate living with a chronic disability, to respond quickly when there is rapid deterioration and to provide assistive technology (e.g. wheelchairs). Each function should be part of a coherent service7.


    DIAGNOSIS
Go to previous sectionTOP
Go to previous sectionINTRODUCTION
 DIAGNOSIS
Go to next sectionMANAGEMENT OF DISABLING SYMPTOMS
Go to next sectionPSYCHOSOCIAL PROBLEMS
Go to next sectionCOMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR THOSE...
Go to next sectionROLE OF THE MS...
Go to next sectionASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
Go to next sectionAPPENDIX 1: USEFUL ADDRESSES
Go to next sectionREFERENCES
 
Early adjustment greatly facilitates later management. Hospital specialists and general practitioners (GPs) should liaise from the earliest stages to support the individual and family. Ideally, adjustment is aided by psychological support but this is seldom available. The first interview may need to be relatively free of detail, as the patient is unlikely to remember much after the emotional assault of being given the diagnosis. Information from the Multiple Sclerosis Society (MSS)8 should be available and a second consultation should be arranged, with the patient and partner being encouraged to bring a list of written questions9. This is likely to be a period of doubt and despair, and the second interview can restore confidence. Some are helped by contacting the MSS whilst others find this distressing.

Honesty with the patient is usually the best policy. If diagnostic uncertainties exist, a straightforward explanation can be promised when the situation has clarified. Often patients experience a grieving process including emotional shock, anger, depression and denial3,10.

A balance needs to be found between over-accepting MS and denying it3—see Figure 1.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Coming to terms with MS (Reproduced with permission from Multiple Sclerosis: a Personal Exploration by A Burnfield, Souvenir Press, London, 1985)

 


    MANAGEMENT OF DISABLING SYMPTOMS
Go to previous sectionTOP
Go to previous sectionINTRODUCTION
Go to previous sectionDIAGNOSIS
 MANAGEMENT OF DISABLING SYMPTOMS
Go to next sectionPSYCHOSOCIAL PROBLEMS
Go to next sectionCOMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR THOSE...
Go to next sectionROLE OF THE MS...
Go to next sectionASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
Go to next sectionAPPENDIX 1: USEFUL ADDRESSES
Go to next sectionREFERENCES
 
Pain
Estimates vary about the prevalence of pain experienced by individuals with MS, which includes trigeminal neuralgia, Lhermitte's phenomenon, burning pain and pain related to optic neuritis and spasms. Trigeminal neuralgia may be mimicked by dental abscesses or cavities. Generally neurogenic pains respond well to anticonvulsants or tricyclic antidepressants. Neurodestructive procedures on the trigeminal ganglion, e.g. radiofrequency or balloon compression, may give pain relief for as much as five years.

Another common trouble is musculoskeletal pain which, though not directly attributable to the MS, results from prolonged immobility, poor posture and gait abnormalities. Thus the cause of pain needs evaluation3.

Spasticity can lead to:

By limiting the capacity to exercise, spasticity can lead to cardiovascular deconditioning and exacerbate muscular weakness. Therapeutic goals for spasticity management should be identified with the multidisciplinary team, and treatment should be systematic, with good documentation11. Individuals with MS need to understand the importance of time for exercising and stretching so that the new movement patterns can be made a part of everyday living. Carers can learn to help by becoming involved in management.

The team's approach to management must be acceptable to the individual, and if possible also to the family8. Treatment can be divided broadly into physical, medical and surgical (Box 1). Neurophysiotherapists are invaluable in the management of severe spasticity, assessing its pattern, severity and likelihood of improvement with therapy. Identification of contractures is a prerequisite to defining possible goals; for instance standing with minimal support might be assisted by medication, therapy to stretch and strengthen appropriate muscle groups, injection of botulinum toxin into calf muscles11 or release of tendo achilles. After chemical denervation, intensive stretching of shortened muscles is critical to improvement. Continuing therapy is seldom available on the National Health Service (NHS) and carers may need to be taught techniques of stretching.

Incontinence
Urinary troubles are common and sometimes lead to social isolation through fear of incontinence. The aims of management are to preserve renal function and alleviate symptoms, the commonest being incontinence12. Measures available are summarized in Box 2. Residual volumes (measured by catheter or ultrasound) greater than 100 mL require drainage13. If the individual is unable to self-catheterize (for example, because of visual impairment, adductor spasticity, tremor or weakness) carers may be taught intermittent catheterization.


Box 1 Management of spasticity

General—removal of stimuli

  • Constipation
  • Urinary infections
  • Ingrown toenails
  • Pressure sores
  • Fractures

Physical

  • Seating posture
  • Tilt tabling
  • Stretching and strengthening
  • Gait training
  • Serial casting and orthoses

Medication

  • Diazepam
  • Baclofen
  • Dantrolene
  • Tizanidine

Invasive medication

  • Intrathecal baclofen
  • Intrathecal phenol
  • Nerve blocks
  • Botulinum toxin

Surgical

  • Tenotomies
  • Rhizotomy
  • Spinal cord and cerebellar stimulation

 

Many individuals experience constipation, and this can be difficult to treat. Overflow faecal incontinence greatly complicates living in the community. Management includes high fibre diet, sufficient fluid intake, avoidance of constipating medication, use of the gastrocolic reflex, unhurried defaecation and digital stimulation. For many, planned bowel evacuation (e.g. on alternate mornings after breakfast) relieves the fear of possibly needing to defaecate at inconvenient times or in inappropriate places. Faecal incontinence not secondary to constipation may respond to anticholinergics.

Cognitive loss
Impaired cognition may be profoundly disabling3 and is a major cause of inability to work1. Specific deficits include poor memory, slow information processing and impaired learning. Detailed neuropsychological assessment, if available, can lead to a more tailored rehabilitation programme14. Less commonly, personality and behaviour may change. Partners and family must recognize that cognitive deficits are present and that these reflect the disease process.

Fatigue
Fatigue is common, reflecting muscle weakness, exhaustion (irrespective of activity) and sleep interruption (e.g. from nocturia or spasms).

Employers, relatives and professionals may misunderstand fatigue. It can dominate individuals' lives, commonly being exacerbated by heat and exertion. It is often felt as ‘flu-like’, with disturbances of vision, speech, mobility, coordination and sensation after minimal activity. Concentration and memory may be affected. Depression can exacerbate fatigue, as can the increased energy requirements for ambulation or transfers. It is important to explain to the individual and family the possible reasons for fatigue. Helpful strategies are to pace activities throughout the day, to take rest periods and to take gentle exercise such as swimming in a cool pool. Amantadine and modafinil15 are occasionally prescribed but their place in management is not yet established.

Immobility
Walking is usually affected if the disease is progressive, through a combination of weakness, spasticity, fatigue, disuse, pain, cerebellar ataxia and sensory loss (particularly proprioception)14,16. Inability to take weight through the legs can prevent major transfers (Box 3).


Box 2 Management of incontinence

General

  • Good fluid intake (3L per day if tolerated)
  • Perineal hygiene
  • Adjustment of urine pH
  • Pelvic floor exercises/bladder retraining
  • Pads, Conveens

Medication

  • Anticholinergics
  • Desmopressin
  • Antibiotics for urinary infections (occasionally prophylactic)

Invasive medication

  • Intravesical capsaicin/resiniferatoxin

Catheters

  • Urethral—intermittent or indwelling
  • Suprapubic

Surgical

  • e.g. ileal loop diversion

 


Box 3 What is learned from the home visit? (modified from Ref. 17)

Medical/physical

  • Screening for illness—e.g. urinary infections
  • Pain management
  • Swallowing/communication

Psychological

  • Emotional agendas
  • Fears/worries
  • Relationship issues—illness/pain behaviour—effects on partner
  • Partner's health and emotional welibeing

Environmental

  • Transfers—e.g. on/off bed, chair or toilet
  • Stairs—banister, grab rails, stair elevator/lift
  • Toilet—bucket in kitchen, upstairs toilet?
  • Wheelchair use and access
  • Potential for environmental controls

Independence

  • Bath aids, commode by bed
  • Mobility aids—e.g. elbow crutch, trolley

Transport

  • Transfer into car, safety issues

 

The prevention of lower-limb contractures and maintenance of muscle strength with regular physiotherapy may facilitate mobility but needs careful planning to avoid fatigue. For those who are severely disabled, domiciliary physiotherapy avoids long trips to hospital; moreover, therapy in the home environment (e.g. on carpets) has other advantages.

Mobility may be maintained with walking aids, orthoses, ‘environmental management’ (e.g. strategically placed grab rails) and wheelchairs. A wheelchair should be considered either when the individual becomes unable to walk or when the time or energy consumed by walking reduces functional ability.


Box 4 Impact on carers

Partner

  • Poor health (back pain, depression)
  • Social isolation—e.g. giving up work to care for partner
  • Sexual difficulties (effects of MS on libido, orgasmic potential, sense of being unattractive, potency in men, adductors in women)
  • Financial hardship

Children

  • Additional household chores
  • Reduced social opportunities
  • Increased parental nagging
  • Lost parental support and advice
  • Anxiety, fear, bitterness
  • Fear they will get MS

Parents

  • Need to provide support for grown-up children and grandchildren

 

Outdoor powered mobility can increase the freedom of the individual and the carer18. Driving gives freedom and independence, often enabling a person to continue working. Those wishing to drive can be assessed at driving assessment units (see Mobility and Advice centre—Appendix 1). If intellect, vision and reaction/decision times are not impaired many can drive suitably modified cars.

Pressure sores
Sensory loss, immobility and incontinence are each major risk factors for developing pressure sores commonly seen in MS19 (e.g. sacral sores from lying supine and ischial sores from prolonged sitting). Strategies for their prevention include encouraging postural changes, spasticity management, incontinence management, good sitting position, pressure-relieving beds, and sheepskin-lined trolleys, slings or bootees and smoking reduction. These need consideration before transportation or planned admission to hospital or respite care.

Communication and dysphagia
Speech problems are usually due to weakness, poorly controlled breathing, or dysarthria, singly or in combination. Communication can be helped in some cases with speech and language therapy. Sometimes simple measures (e.g. supporting the neck and spine together with coordinating breathing with speech and relaxation techniques) may help—see communication aids below.

Dysphagia needs assessment by speech and language therapists, usually with access to specialist investigations.

Tremor and extrapyramidal symptoms
Tremor is usually an action tremor reflecting cerebellar dysfunction. Conservative measures such as use of weighted armbands and large-handled implements may help. Resistant tremor may warrant botulinum toxin injection20 or stereotactic surgery21.

Metabolic bone disease
Osteoporosis is not infrequent in wheelchair-dependent individuals22. Other contributing factors include steroid therapy, being housebound, vegetarianism (sometimes with vitamin D deficiency), smoking and alcohol abuse. Management, which is changing rapidly, may include regular exercise (when possible), calcium and vitamin D, stopping smoking and treatment with bisphosphonates.

Osteoporotic femoral fractures, which have been reported in paraplegic people with MS23, may be asymptomatic and detected incidentally.


    PSYCHOSOCIAL PROBLEMS
Go to previous sectionTOP
Go to previous sectionINTRODUCTION
Go to previous sectionDIAGNOSIS
Go to previous sectionMANAGEMENT OF DISABLING SYMPTOMS
 PSYCHOSOCIAL PROBLEMS
Go to next sectionCOMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR THOSE...
Go to next sectionROLE OF THE MS...
Go to next sectionASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
Go to next sectionAPPENDIX 1: USEFUL ADDRESSES
Go to next sectionREFERENCES
 
Depression is said to be common in MS, although this was not borne out by a recent study in a severely disabled group2. Where present it may hamper rehabilitation through reduced motivation. Antidepressants may work well. Other mood disturbances include emotional lability and uninhibited crying or laughing, euphoria and anxiety. Irritability and inability to empathize with others can contribute to relationship breakdowns. These, together with the fear of public embarrassment through urinary incontinence or spasticity, may result in social isolation, often also experienced by the carer.

Sexual difficulties can reflect exhaustion, disturbed mood and practical elements (Box 4). Impotence may be helped with penile prostheses, intracavernous injections and sildenafil. The Association to Aid the Sexual and Personal Relationships of People with a Disability (formerly SPOD) can often be helpful (Appendix 1).

Potentially three generations are affected by a diagnosis of MS. Partners and other family members may need both physical and emotional support24; effects on children are often ignored (Box 4)14,25,26.

Psychosocial management
A comprehensive assessment should include personal and domestic skills, mobility, accommodation, legal matters, employment, finance, social and leisure activities and potential problems with relationships.

Work can provide a sense of identity, status, achievement and personal satisfaction, as well as money10. Reasons for unemployment include27 fear of discrimination, lack of confidence, low self-esteem and the poverty trap (allowances exceeding earning potential).

For those in employment factors to consider28 are openness with the employer, job modification (tasks or environment), reduced or flexible hours, and travel or driving assistance. The disability employment adviser at the local job centre can help those seeking employment28. Many need advice about benefits, and this can be obtained from charities or the Citizens' Advice Bureau (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Potential benefits available to those with multiple sclerosis

 


    COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR THOSE SEVERELY DISABLED BY MS
Go to previous sectionTOP
Go to previous sectionINTRODUCTION
Go to previous sectionDIAGNOSIS
Go to previous sectionMANAGEMENT OF DISABLING SYMPTOMS
Go to previous sectionPSYCHOSOCIAL PROBLEMS
 COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR THOSE...
Go to next sectionROLE OF THE MS...
Go to next sectionASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
Go to next sectionAPPENDIX 1: USEFUL ADDRESSES
Go to next sectionREFERENCES
 
Most individuals can be supported in the community with dignity3. This requires the close collaboration of employment, housing, health and social services28,29,30 and the recognition of the social dimension by health professionals. The cementing of links between hospital and community (health and social) services is facilitated by a case conference where a GP's knowledge of affected individuals and their families is often crucial. A home visit is usual to understand the individual's perspective and practical problems (see Box 3). Professionally guided self-care, focused on individual interests and concerns, improves health status31. The teamwork requires a carefully formulated strategy for community support29. Occasionally individuals do not wish to remain at home when residential care can be arranged, for example through a Cheshire Home.

Carer respite may be provided by holiday relief (social services, or charities such as Winged Fellowship Trust, Appendix 1), by domiciliary respites (professional or voluntary services such as Crossroad Care-attendant schemes, Appendix 1), and by day centres.

Risk factors for the breakdown of the support network are both intrinsic (within the client) and extrinsic (within the family, home, or community)32, Box 5.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Box 5. Reasons for breakdown of community support

 


    ROLE OF THE MS SOCIETY AND OTHER GROUPS
Go to previous sectionTOP
Go to previous sectionINTRODUCTION
Go to previous sectionDIAGNOSIS
Go to previous sectionMANAGEMENT OF DISABLING SYMPTOMS
Go to previous sectionPSYCHOSOCIAL PROBLEMS
Go to previous sectionCOMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR THOSE...
 ROLE OF THE MS...
Go to next sectionASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
Go to next sectionAPPENDIX 1: USEFUL ADDRESSES
Go to next sectionREFERENCES
 
The MSS has a national centre in North London and about 370 branches throughout the UK. Box 6 summarizes its many functions. The branches are mostly run by volunteers who either have MS themselves or a family member affected. These self-help groups allow members to meet others with the disease, and provide enormous emotional support. They also allow those with MS to feel that they are helping others.

Excellent publications and library facilities for patients, carers and professional staff are also available from the Multiple Sclerosis Trust. Other charities providing assistance for those with MS are listed in the leaflet MS: Who Can Help? available from the MS help line. Details of other local voluntary bodies are found in local libraries or the community section of telephone directories.


    ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
Go to previous sectionTOP
Go to previous sectionINTRODUCTION
Go to previous sectionDIAGNOSIS
Go to previous sectionMANAGEMENT OF DISABLING SYMPTOMS
Go to previous sectionPSYCHOSOCIAL PROBLEMS
Go to previous sectionCOMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR THOSE...
Go to previous sectionROLE OF THE MS...
 ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
Go to next sectionAPPENDIX 1: USEFUL ADDRESSES
Go to next sectionREFERENCES
 
Communication aids
Communication aids are available to enhance, or replace, speech. They require linguistic ability and cognition. Three different types exist:

Other types of communication aids include a radio pendant to summon assistance, an adapted telephone and upstairs/downstairs intercoms.

Environmental controls
Environmental control units facilitate environmental manipulation with minimal physical effort33. Most house-hold services controlled through electricity can be worked through such a unit, for example:


Box 6 Roles of the Multiple Sclerosis Society

Branch network provides:

  • Self-help groups
  • Funds for those with financial problems
  • Help to obtain grants from other organizations—e.g. towards a respite holiday
  • Second-hand equipment for sale

Information in the form of:

  • A bimonthly magazine MS Matters
  • Information booklets
  • Videos and tapes
  • Website, [www.mssociety.org.uk]
  • Free phone line (08088008000)
  • Telephone counselling service: London 020 842 22144; Scotland/Northern England 0131 226 6073

Research funding

Voluntary workers may:

  • Attend case conferences
  • Help the professionals see the problems from the sufferers' point of view
  • Act as an advocate

Respite care centres and holiday homes

Service support—e.g. MS specialist nurses

 

Environmental control units are available freely through Department of Health designated medical assessors (usually rehabilitation medicine consultants).

Wheelchairs
Powered wheelchairs include indoor electric chairs and indoor/outdoor chairs. They may be available on the NHS for those unable to walk or self-propel. There is no NHS provision of purely outdoor powered chairs. Hand, foot, head, chin or mouth may operate control switches. Such chairs enhance independence and reduce carer strain17,33.


    APPENDIX 1: USEFUL ADDRESSES
Go to previous sectionTOP
Go to previous sectionINTRODUCTION
Go to previous sectionDIAGNOSIS
Go to previous sectionMANAGEMENT OF DISABLING SYMPTOMS
Go to previous sectionPSYCHOSOCIAL PROBLEMS
Go to previous sectionCOMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR THOSE...
Go to previous sectionROLE OF THE MS...
Go to previous sectionASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
 APPENDIX 1: USEFUL ADDRESSES
Go to next sectionREFERENCES
 
Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) Swansea SA6 7JL; Tel: 01792 772151 [www.dvla.gov.uk]

Mobility Advice and Vehicle Information Service, Macadam Avenue, Old Wokingham Road, Crowthorne RG45 6XD; Tel: 01344661000 [mavis{at}detr.gov.uk]

Multiple Sclerosis Society, MS National Centre, 372 Edgware Road, London NW2 6ND; Tel: 020 8438 0700 [www.mssociety.org.uk]

Multiple Sclerosis Trust, Spirella Building, Bridge Road, Letchworth SG6 4ET; Tel: 01462 476700 [www.mstrust.org.uk]

The Association to Aid the Sexual and Personal Relationships of People with a Disability, 286 Camden Road, London N7 0BJ; Tel: 0207 6078851 [www.spod-uk.org]

The Crossroads Care Attendant Scheme, 10 Regent Place, Rugby CV21 2PN; Tel: 01788 573653 [www.crossroads.org.uk]

Winged Fellowship Holiday Trust, Angel House, 20-32 Pentonville Road, London N1 9XD; Tel: 020 7833 2594 [www.wft.org.uk]


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Professor Michael Barnes and Professor Scott Glickman for comments on an early draft; members of the Multiple Sclerosis Society for extensive discussion; Hillingdon Social Services for advice on the social benefits available; and Dr Nat Blau for encouragement to publish.


    REFERENCES
Go to previous sectionTOP
Go to previous sectionINTRODUCTION
Go to previous sectionDIAGNOSIS
Go to previous sectionMANAGEMENT OF DISABLING SYMPTOMS
Go to previous sectionPSYCHOSOCIAL PROBLEMS
Go to previous sectionCOMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR THOSE...
Go to previous sectionROLE OF THE MS...
Go to previous sectionASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
Go to previous sectionAPPENDIX 1: USEFUL ADDRESSES
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Kraft GH. Rehabilitation still the only way to improve function in multiple sclerosis. Lancet1999; 354:2016 -17[Medline]

  2. Nicholl CR, Lincoln N, Francis VM, Stephan TF. Assessment of emotional problems in multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil2001; 15:668

  3. Burnfield AJ, Frank AO. Multiple sclerosis. In: Frank AO, Maguire GP, eds. Disabling Diseases. Physical, Environmental and Psychosocial Management. Oxford: Heinemann Medical,1989 : 168-93

  4. Department of Health. Cost Effective Provision of Disease Modifying Therapies for People with Multiple Sclerosis, HSC 2002/004. London: DoH, 2002:1 -31

  5. Freeman JA, Landgon DW, Hobart JC, Thompson AJ. Progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol1997; 42:236 -44[Medline]

  6. Solari A, Filippini G, Gasco P, et al. Physical rehabilitation has a positive effect on disability in multiple sclerosis patients. Neurology1999; 52:57 -62[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Wade DT, Green Q. A Study of Services for Multiple Sclerosis: Lessons for Managing Chronic Disability. London: Clinical Effectiveness & Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians,2001

  8. Parnell R, Alexander M, Kidd J, Russell A. In: Joule N, ed. Search of a Service: the Experience of People with Neurological Conditions. London: The Neurological Alliance,2001

  9. Royal College of Physicians of London. Physical disability services in 1986 and beyond. J R Coll Phys Lond1986; 20:160 -94[Medline]

  10. Graham J, Roberts G. Making the Most of Life with MS: Adjusting to and Coping with Change. London: MS Society,2000

  11. Turner-Stokes L, Ward A. Guidelines for the use of Botulinum Toxin (BTX) in the Management of Spasticity in Adults. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  12. Fowler CJ, Fowler C. Neurogenic bladder dysfunction and its management. In: Greenwood R, Barnes MP, McMillan TM, Ward CD, eds. Neurological Rehabilitation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1993: 269-78

  13. Wiseman OJ, Fowler CJ. Management of the neurogenic bladder. CPD Bull Neurol2001; 2:61 -4

  14. Roberts M. Mutiple sclerosis. In: Goodwill CJ, Chamberlain MA, Evans C, eds. Rehabilitation of the Physically Disabled Adult. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes, 1997:335 -51

  15. Rammohan KW, Rosenberg JH, Lynn DJ, Blumenfeld AM, Pollak CP, Nagaraja HN. Efficacy and safety of modafinil (Provigil) for the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a two centre phase 2 study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2002; 72:179 -83[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Barnes MP. Multiple sclerosis. In: Greenwood R, Barnes MP, McMillan TM, Ward CD, eds. Neurological Rehabilitation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1993:485 -504

  17. Frank AO. Conservative management of low back pain. Home Health Care Consultant2001; 8:16 -23

  18. Frank AO, Ward JH, Orwell NJ, McCullagh C, Belcher M. Introduction of the new NHS electric powered indoor/outdoor chair (EPIOC) service: benefits, risks and implications for prescribers. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:665 -73[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. McClemont E, Henderson H, Philips J. The maintenance of tissue viability. In: Goodwill CJ, Chamberlain MA, Evans C, eds. Rehabilitation of the Physically Disabled Adult. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes, 1997:509 -25

  20. Bain P. The management of tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:13 -19

  21. Center for Movement Disorders. Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Action Tremor Secondary to Multiple Sclerosis [http://nyneurosurgery.org/Adult/Movement/msdbs.htm]

  22. Hassell A, Peel N. Osteoporosis and Immobility, New Thoughts. London: British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine,2002 : 159-60

  23. Williams PL, Frank AO. Unrecognised femoral neck fractures in patients with paraplegia due to multiple sclerosis. BMJ1984; 289:501

  24. Frank AO. The family and disability. Some reflections on culture. J R Soc Med1989; 82:666 -8[Abstract]

  25. Coster T, Sturge JC, Williams KA, Frank AO. Pilot investigation into the needs of children when one parent has multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil1989; 3:80

  26. Sturge C, Frank AO, Coster T. Who cares for young carers? BMJ1994; 308:1510 -11[Free Full Text]

  27. McCarthy J. Providing training for employment. In: Goodwill DJ, Chamberlain MA, Evans C, eds. Rehabilitation of the Physically Disabled Adult. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes, 1997:744 -56

  28. British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. Vocational Rehabilitation: the Way Forward. London: BSRM,2000

  29. Ellis PF, Frank AO. Care of a severely handicapped person over eight years: implications for the future pattern of community care (case report). Br J Gen Pract1990; 40:383 -5[Medline]

  30. Freeman JA. Rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. World Forum for Neurological Rehabilitation Update, September2001

  31. O'Hara L, Cadbury H, De Souza LH, Ide L. Evaluation of the effectiveness of professionally guided self-care for people with multiple sclerosis living in the community: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2002; 16:119 -28[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  32. Cantrell T. The breakdown of home care in multiple sclerosis. Demonstration Centres in Rehabilitation Newsletter1982; 29:29 -35

  33. Fyfe N, Goodwill J, Hoyle E, Sandles L. Orthoses, mobility aids and environmental control systems. In: Greenwood R, Barnes MP, McMillan TM, Ward CD, eds. Neurological Rehabilitation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1993:229 -42


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
A. O. Frank and M. A. Chamberlain
Rehabilitation: an integral part of clinical practice.
Occup. Med., August 1, 2006; 56(5): 289 - 291.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
J C Gibson and A O Frank
Supporting individuals with disabling multiple sclerosis
J R Soc Med, May 1, 2003; 96(5): 256 - 257.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
A. Ryle
Supporting individuals with disabling multiple sclerosis
J R Soc Med, February 1, 2003; 96(2): 104 - 104.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Walking London's Medical History