RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2002;95:272
doi:10.1258/jrsm.95.5.272-b
© 2002 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, J. K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2002;95:272
© 2002 The Royal Society of Medicine

Back pain—whose responsibility?

John K Paterson

1 rue du Castellas, 13640 la Roque D'Anthéron, France.

In his account of the RSM's excellent conference (February 2002 JRSM1) Malcolm Morrison rightly indicates that no formal conclusions were reached nor were any resolutions passed. My chief disappointment in the meeting was the under-representation of medical educators.

I entirely agree that more cases of back pain should be dealt with in primary care (or in the workplace). There is a mass of evidence on the efficacy and safety of musculoskeletal therapies2. But I cannot accept that it is ‘... the responsibility of all those who deal with back pain, across the disciplines, to ensure that patients do not endure prolonged suffering...’; at present they cannot help it— the great majority of them do not know how!

Professor Mansell Aylward made some pertinent comments on the costs. The most important factor in improving the patient's lot is surely for those in primary care to be taught how to deal with these disorders. Contrary to some long held beliefs3, this is not time-consuming and diminishes the primary-care clinical work-load by reducing the need for multiple follow-up attendances.

REFERENCES

  1. Morrison M. Back pain—whose responsibility? J R Soc Med 2002;95:98 -9

  2. Burn L, Paterson JK. Musculoskeletal Medicine, the Spine. London: Kluwer Academic, 1990

  3. British Medical Association. Report of the Board of Science and Education. Alternative Therapy. London: BMA,1986


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, J. K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Get Through Series