J R Soc Med 2002;95:468
doi:10.1258/jrsm.95.9.468
© 2002 Royal Society of Medicine
Hospice: a global network
Cicely Saunders OM DBE FRCP
St Christopher's Hospice, 51-59 Lawrie Park Road, London SE26 6DZ,
UK
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Soon after St Christopher's Hospice began admitting patients
in 1967, it
became obvious that this new approach to end-of-life
care should not be
regarded as
the model but rather as a demonstration
of principles
that could be interpreted variously in different
cultures and settings. A
paper,
Essentials for a Hospice, emerged
from staff discussions. Ten
years later, in 1977, an Information
Service was set up to deal with the
growing volume of inquiries.
This year, much enlarged, working with Help the
Hospices and
now named Hospice Information, the service celebrates its 25th
birthday.
After another ten years, in 1987, came the quarterly
Hospice
Bulletin,
which quickly developed an international circulation.
Directories
were produced for various countries (now approaching one hundred),
and
fact sheets, continually updated, offered advice on specific
matters. The
most popular of the twenty existing fact sheets
is
Flying Home or on
Holiday, written for people who wish to
end their days in their home
country or have that last holiday.
Through personal contacts developed around
the world, these
people can be put in touch with the nearest hospice or
palliative
care team. And after yet another decade, the interweaving of
contacts
and ideas was marked by publication of
Hospice on the
International
Scene1.
This
collection of essays set the seal on the idea that certain
principles apply
across a wide range of cultures and settings:
in their concluding chapter
Kastenbaum and Wilson declared,
All world cultures have traditional
strengths that can
contribute to the success of a palliative care
programme.
It was the anniversary of the Information Service that set me thinking
about how the networks can be further expanded. The need for communication
extends not only to healthcare workers but also to society in general. We have
seen how, in many countries that have a tradition of concealing the truth as
treatments fail, good care may lead to more honest communication and a happier
end. Likewise, cultural obstacles to pain relief can be overcome, and
Kastenbaum and Wilson see this as one of the greatest challenges. Despite the
large volume of published work and the signal efforts of the World Health
Organization, some professional workers and governments resist the
availability of cheap and effective medication for fear it will lead to drug
dependence or even lethal intervention.
Some challenges can be met by better dissemination of existing knowledge;
there is a vast array of published work to be assessed and communicated.
Others demand original research; large gaps in scientific knowledge wait to be
filled. At St Christopher's we began by concentrating on malignant disease,
but palliative care research now embraces conditions such as end-stage cardiac
failure, multiple sclerosis, motorneuron disease, and the neuropathic pain of
diabetes mellitusto say nothing of the devastating epidemic of AIDS.
The issues require examination in population as well as individual terms, and
Jan Stjernsward, late of the WHO Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care, calls
for a public-health
approach2. All
healthcare workers, he argues, should be trained in management of pain and
other key symptoms; professionals also have a duty to educate the public in
these matters.
As an example of how a large public programme can start from small
beginnings, I can cite the work of Dr Anne Merriman in Uganda. A small charity
financed largely by overseas donations enabled her to set up a local programme
of care and education, Hospice Uganda. This still serves only the Kampala
region; but, as a result of its work, the Ugandan Government has now
classified palliative care with pain control as an essential service to be
available throughout the country; liquid morphine must be available free of
charge to patients with AIDS or cancer who require it.
Information allows choicesindividually, nationally and
internationally. Ultimately, the network should include everybody.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Saunders C, Kastenbaum R, eds. Hospice on the
International Scene. New York: Springer,1997
- Stjernsward J. The global need for palliative care. In: Merrit G,
ed. Humanitarian Affairs Review. Brussels: Didier
Goffart, 2002: 26-7

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?