RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2003;96:592-594
doi:10.1258/jrsm.96.12.592
© 2003 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baron, S.
Right arrow Articles by Stables, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2003;96:592-594
© 2003 The Royal Society of Medicine

Atypical melanoma

Susannah Baron ChB MRCP   Victoria Goulden MD FRCP     Graeme Stables MD FRCP  

General Infirmary at Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK

Correspondence to: Dr S Baron E-mail: Susannah.baron{at}ntlworld.com

The incidence of malignant melanoma continues to rise in many parts of the world. A seven-point checklist for moles is useful in identifying lesions that need to be excised. The three major signs are change in shape, change in size and change in colour; the four minor signs are over 7 mm in diameter, inflammation, crusting or bleeding and minor irritation or itch. Lesions with any major signs or three minor signs are suspicious of melanoma.1 Unfortunately malignant melanoma can present atypically.

CASE HISTORIES

Case 1
A woman of 40 sought advice about an erythematous scaly plaque on her left arm, 0.66x.4 cm, which had appeared 3 years earlier (Figure 1). The lesion had gradually increased in size and become more erythematous over the preceding three months. She had experienced blistering sunburn in childhood but there was no family history of skin cancer. The differential diagnosis was Bowen's disease (intraepithelial carcinoma) or an irritated seborrhoeic wart, but a punch biopsy showed in-situ melanoma. The melanoma was excised with a 5 mm margin and histological examination confirmed lack of dermal invasion. The patient was apparently disease-free twelve months later.



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Lesion in patient 1

 

CASE 2
A woman aged 79 had first noticed the lesion on her cheek 2 years before, after a minor trauma. It had gradually enlarged. On examination she had an infiltrated plaque with a pearly edge; the diameter was about 3.3 cm but the edges were indistinct. Directly below her eye were two pigmented macules and there were several pigmented nodules within the plaque (Figure 2). The clinical diagnosis was a pigmented basal cell carcinoma but urgent biopsy revealed the lesion to be a superficial spreading malignant melanoma with both vertical and horizontal growth phases. The maximum thickness of the tumour on biopsy was 4.2 mm. The melanoma was widely excised by the plastic surgeons and the area was reconstructed with a skin graft. On histological examination the Breslow thickness was 6.1 mm. There were no signs of recurrent disease eighteen months later.



View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Lesion in patient 2

 

CASE 3
A woman of 50 had 3 years earlier noticed a raised skin-coloured nodule on her right lower shin, which was diagnosed by her general practitioner as a dermatofibroma. In the past twelve months it had increased in size and bled, spontaneously, prompting a referral to the dermatology department. On examination the lesion was domed, flesh coloured, and firm, 1 cm in diameter, with a small area of irregular brown pigmentation around one lateral border (Figure 3). Because of the macular pigmentation an incisional biopsy was performed, which was reported as showing a benign intradermal naevus. The appearance remained of clinical concern, so the lesion was excised by the plastic surgeons in a procedure requiring a full-thickness skin graft. Histological examination of the entire specimen showed a melanoma in vertical growth phase with a Breslow thickness of 2.5 mm, extending to Clark's level 4. Unfortunately five months after excision she developed enlarged inguinal lymph nodes, positive for metastatic melanoma. She entered a clinical trial of interferon-alpha.



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Lesion in patient 3

 

CASE 4
At age 41 a woman was referred by her general practitioner with an enlarging, discharging ulcerated lesion at the base of her right third toe; it had appeared six months earlier after a sandfly bite in Belize (Figure 4). The history and appearance was suggestive of cutaneous leishmaniasis and a biopsy was taken. This showed invasive malignant melanoma with a Breslow thickness of 4 mm. The melanoma was widely excised with 2 cm margins and the area was reconstructed with a split skin graft. Histological examination confirmed a superficial spreading malignant melanoma with a predominant ulcerated nodular component of maximum Breslow thickness 4.9 mm (Clark's level 5). A wider excision was then performed with amputation of the third and fourth toes. A year later, melanoma was found in an enlarged right inguinal lymph node and had metastasized to lungs and liver. Despite chemotherapy she died two months later.



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Lesion in patient 4

 

COMMENT

Early detection of malignant melanoma is essential since survival prospects are strongly related to tumour (Breslow) thickness at the time of diagnosis.2 The Breslow thickness, measured on histological examination, is the distance between the overlying epidermal granular layer and the deepest invasive area of the primary lesion.3 For lesions of Breslow thickness <1 mm the recommended excision margin is 1 cm and 5-year survival is 95–100%. For Breslow thickness >4 mm the recommended margin is 2–3 cm and 5-year survival is about 50%. The levels of invasion into the dermis introduced by Clark et al.4 are a similar prognostic indicator related to penetration by the primary lesion, level 5 signifying invasion into fat.

About 2% of all melanomas are amelanotic, though on close inspection most amelanotic tumours do show pigmentation of the adjacent skin, as in case 3. Amelanotic melanoma is the subtype most often reported as simulating other cutaneous lesions, but even pigmented melanomas are commonly misdiagnosed—especially as melanocytic naevus, basal cell carcinoma, seborrhoeic keratosis or lentigo.5

In a study comparing the ability of general practitioners and dermatologists to discriminate pigmented lesions the general practitioners made an exact diagnosis of melanoma in 50% of the cases compared with the dermatologists' 84%.6 Any changing or atypical mole or non-healing skin lesion should be referred urgently to a dermatologist or to a surgeon with a special interest in pigmented lesions.

REFERENCES

  1. Du Vivier AWP, Williams HC, Brett JV, Higgens EM. How do malignant melanomas present and does this correlate with the seven-point check-list? Clin Exp Dermatol1991; 16:344 -7[CrossRef][Medline]

  2. MacKie RM, Hole D, Hunter JA, et al. Cutaneous malignant melanoma in Scotland: incidence, survival, and mortality, 1979–94. BMJ1997; 315:111 -21

  3. Breslow A. Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg1970; 172:902 -8[Medline]

  4. Clark WH, Elder D, Guerry D, et al. Model predicting survival in stage I melanoma based on tumour progression. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;87:1893 -904

  5. Witheiler DD, Cockerell CJ. Histologic features and sensitivity of diagnosis of clinically unsuspected cutaneous melanoma. Am J Dermatopathol 1991;13:551 -6[Medline]

  6. Brochez L, Verhaeghe E, Bleyen L, et al. Diagnostic ability of general practitioners and dermatologists in discriminating pigmented skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol2001; 44:979 -85[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baron, S.
Right arrow Articles by Stables, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Get Through Series