RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2003;96:207-208
doi:10.1258/jrsm.96.4.207-a
© 2003 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madeley, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2003;96:207-208
© 2003 The Royal Society of Medicine

Prescription of neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza

Dick Madeley

Burnfoot, Stocksfield NE43 7TN, UK

E-mail: dickmadeley{at}aol.com

Mr Da Silva and colleagues' sensible paper on prescribing neuroaminidase inhibitors for influenza in general practice (February 2003 JRSM1) attempts to put their use into a realistic context—i.e. those presenting within 36 hours of onset. Their results are nonetheless based on soft data. A considerable proportion of ‘influenza-like illnesses’ in patients of all ages are not due to influenza viruses (as Da Silva et al. acknowledge) and this proportion is liable to increase both when ‘flu’ is reported in the media as being present and when patients and doctors become aware that a cure may be available.

Hence, it will be very difficult to assess whether such drugs are genuinely useful in general practice unless one or more studies are done in which a diagnostic virus laboratory is used to confirm the cause in each case. Given the considerable practical difficulties of doing this, a well-prepared prospective study is necessary. In its absence, there is a danger of overprescribing; and, just as bad, overuse will discredit a useful group of drugs. It would be in the interest of the manufacturer(s) to sponsor such a study, as well as a search for a reliable and fast (< 1 hour) test.

REFERENCES

  1. Da Silva PR, Nguyen-Van Tan J, Hayward AC. Logistic issues and potential prescribing costs associated with use of neuraminidase inhibitors for the treatment of influenza in primary care. J R Soc Med 2003;96:66 -9[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madeley, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

MDU Exam Doctor