J R Soc Med 2003;96:315
doi:10.1258/jrsm.96.6.315-a
© 2003 Royal Society of Medicine
Cocaine by internal mail
John Bycroft
Institute of Urology & Nephrology, 48 Riding House Street, London W1W
7EY, UK
Mr Swan and his co-authors describe two body packer cases
(April 2003
JRSM1) that
required surgical intervention. In their closing statement they say that drugs
packages are invariably radio-opaque, and this is incorrect. Although the
majority of packages may be visualized with plain abdominal radiographs, there
are numerous reports of false-negative radiographs and
subsequently missed packages.
2,3,4
In equivocal cases the use of CT, ultrasound or contrast meals should be
considered; plain radiographs should not be relied on entirely. Doctors
dealing with potential body packers should also be aware of disturbing reports
from the United States of children acting as surgical mules.
5 The diagnosis must
therefore be considered within the paediatric population as well.
REFERENCES
- Swan MC, Byrom R, Nicolaou M, Paes T. Cocaine by internal mail: two
surgical cases. J R Soc Med2003; 96:188
-9[Free Full Text]
- Caruana DS, Weinbach B, Goerg D, Gardner LB. Cocaine-packet
ingestion. Diagnosis, management, and natural history. Ann Intern
Med 1984;100:73
-4
- Gherardi R, Marc B, Alberti X, Baud F, Diamant-Berger O. A cocaine
body packer with normal abdominal plain radiograms. Value of drug detection in
urine and contrast study of the bowel. Am J Forens Med
Pathol 1990;11:154
-7[Medline]
- McCarron MM, Wood JD. The cocaine body packer
syndrome. Diagnosis and treatment. JAMA1983; 250:1417
-20[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Traub SJ, Kohn GL, Hoffman RS, Nelson LS. Pediatric body
packing. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med2003; 157:174
-7[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?