RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2003;96:400-401
doi:10.1258/jrsm.96.8.400
© 2003 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casula, R. P
Right arrow Articles by Darzi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2003;96:400-401
© 2003 The Royal Society of Medicine

Totally endoscopic robotically enhanced coronary artery bypass on the beating heart

Roberto P Casula MD FETCS   Thanos Athanasiou MD   Ashok Cherian MD   Ross Bacon FRCA  1 Rodney Foale FRCP     Ara Darzi FRCS  2

1 Directorate of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Anaesthetic Unit, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK
2 Directorate of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the Academic Surgical Unit, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK

Correspondence to: Roberto P Casula E-mail: roberto.casula{at}st-marys.nhs.uk

The introduction of telemanipulation systems has increased surgical dexterity and accuracy, providing seven degrees of freedom of motion, tremor filtration and three-dimensional visualization.1 With the aid of a new-generation articulated coronary stabilizer, cardiac surgeons are now able to perform completely endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting without thoracotomy.2 At St Mary's Hospital we have used the Da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Mountainview, CA). The surgeon works at a master unit where his/her hands movements are accurately reproduced by the slave instruments inside the chest. We report the first two UK cases.

CASE HISTORIES

Case 1
A male ex-smoker aged 45 had a 9-month history of angina on exertion and his exercise test was positive. Comorbidity included hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia and obesity. Cardiac catheterization and angiography showed preserved ventricular function and a proximal occlusion of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery not suitable for angioplasty. For this reason a minimally invasive approach was considered.

Case 2
A very active man of 41 with hypercholesterolaemia reported 2 years of angina on limited exertion and his exercise test was positive. A percutaneous angioplasty to his LAD territory had failed and he was not keen to have coronary bypass grafting through a full sternotomy.

OPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

The patient was placed supine on the operating table and the left hemithorax was slightly raised by placing an inflatable bag under the left scapula. The procedure was performed under general anaesthesia, with double-lumen endotracheal intubation to allow single right lung ventilation. Initially a 12 mm port was inserted via the fourth intercostal space at the level of the anterior axillary line. A 3D camera at 30° ‘looking up’ was inserted into the chest. Intrathoracic insufflation was started at plus 5 mmHg and increased to 12 mmHg. With the aid of the 3D camera another two 8 mm ports were inserted under direct vision via the second and sixth intercostal spaces. These latest ports allowed right and left instrument positioning. The left internal mammary artery was dissected off the chest wall from its bifurcation distally up to the level of the first rib. The patient was heparinized (15 000 units) and the distal left internal mammary artery was skeletonized in its distal few centimetres to allow application of an endovascular ‘bulldog’ clamp. The pericardium was opened from above the diaphragm up to the level of the pulmonary artery. The LAD artery was identified. The left internal mammary artery was transected after distal application of a clip, and its flow was visually assessed. The camera was then changed to 30° ‘looking down’. A 12 mm port was placed under the left costal arch for introduction of an endoscopic stabilizer (Intuitive Surgical, Mountainview, CA) which functions by applying suction to the epicardium and improves visibility by continuous irrigation. Two silastic loops were placed proximally and distally to the chosen arteriotomy site. An arteriotomy was performed and the left internal mammary to LAD anastomosis was fashioned with running 7-0 Prolene (Ethicon, UK) (Figure 1). Two chest drains were placed via the previously inserted ports. The total surgical times were 4 and 5 hours. LAD artery occlusion times were 45 and 35 minutes. Both patients were fully mobilized by the fourth postoperative day and they were discharged home on days six and five. On review three weeks after surgery they had recovered completely.



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Da Vinci console/anastomosis

 

COMMENT

The usual indication for minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery (MIDCAB) is isolated disease of the left anterior descending artery.3 The aim, by avoiding sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic manipulation, is to reduce morbidity, length of stay and cost without compromising the quality of the surgical procedure. Randomized trials have shown MIDCAB to be effective, with a trend to superiority over transcutaneous angioplasty/stent in terms of reintervention rates and freedom from angina recurrence.4 Relative contraindications are an intramyocardial course of the left anterior descending artery and a small diffusely diseased vessel. Usually this procedure has been done via an anterolateral thoracotomy, which can be very uncomfortable in the early postoperative period. Robotic harvesting of the left internal mammary artery, with manual microvascular anastomosis to the left anterior descending artery, required smaller skin incisions and avoids spreading of the ribs. Totally endoscopic bypass surgery (TECAB) has been much aided by development of the articulated endoscopic stabilizer, and surgeons elsewhere have achieved preliminary clinical and angiographic patency results comparable with those of conventional surgical revascularization techniques.5

The preservation of chest integrity via a TECAB approach offers a superior cosmetic result (Figure 2) and a faster and less painful recovery. Further randomized trials are required to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of this procedure.6,7 Refinements and miniaturization may allow expansion of the current application—selected cases of single-vessel left anterior descending artery disease—to multivessel procedures.



View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Early postoperative result

 

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the contribution of all members of the staff in Theatre 8, of S Martin and of Drs G Symons and J Hood in the development of the robotic cardiac programme at St Mary's Hospital since February 2001. We also thank Chris Priest and the Medical Illustration Department of the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital.

REFERENCES

  1. Garcia-Ruiz A, Smedira NG, Loop FD, et al. Robotic surgical instruments for dexterity enhancement in thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass graft. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A1997; 7:277 -83[Medline]

  2. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, Autschbach R, Mohr FW. Developments in robotic cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol2000; 15:378 -87[CrossRef][Medline]

  3. Subramanian V, Patel N. Current status of MIDCAB procedure. Curr Opin Cardiol2001; 16:268 -70[Medline]

  4. Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, et al. Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med2002; 347:561 -6[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Falk V, Gummet J, Walther T, Haynesi M, Berry GJ, Mohr FW. Quality of computer enhanced endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft anastomosis—comparison to conventional techniques. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg1999; 13:260 -6

  6. Mack MJ. Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA2001; 285:568 -72[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Magee MJ, Mack MJ. Robotics and coronary artery surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol2002; 17:602 -7[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casula, R. P
Right arrow Articles by Darzi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

How Not to be a Doctor