JRSM > Volume 96, Number 9 > Pp. 474

This Article Full Text (PDF) Send a Quick Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Quick Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hardern, R Articles by Protheroe, D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Letters

Use of section 5(2) of the Mental Health Act on a medical admissions unit

R Hardern   D Protheroe¹

Medical Admissions Unit, General Infirmary at Leeds, UK
¹ Liaison Psychiatry, General Infirmary at Leeds, UK

Correspondence to: R Hardern, Accident & Emergency, University Hospital of North Durham, Durham DH1 5TW, UK E-mail richard.hardern{at}ndhcnt.northy.nhs.uk

A survey by Jackson and Warner¹ pointed to large deficiencies in doctors' knowledge about consent. Ignorance of the law on capacity to consent to medical treatment could result in inappropriate use of the Mental Health Act (1983). We have audited the use of the Mental Health Act on a medical admissions unit. The unit admits patients with a wide range of acute medical conditions including patients requiring medical management of drug overdose or alcohol withdrawal. It treats more patients with delirium and acute psychiatric problems than most other medical wards.

We reviewed the hospital notes of 14 inpatients detained under the Mental Health Act after discharge from the medical admissions unit. The original reasons for admission were overdose (10), alcohol withdrawal (3) and collapse probably due to a seizure caused by alcohol withdrawal (1).

5 patients were detained by their responsible consultant. Junior staff detained 4 patients after discussion with the responsible consultant; but 5, in contravention of the Mental Health Act, were detained by junior staff without any evidence of consultation with the responsible consultant. In 12 patients' notes the fact that the patient was unwilling to remain in hospital voluntarily was documented. In all cases the two consultants reviewing notes felt that the decision to detain under 5(2) was appropriate. Overall the documentation of the sequence of events which led to the section, the decision-making process and the mental state of the patient was poor.

The Mental Health Act is an important piece of legislation used frequently in the general hospital. Its misuse could have important medicolegal consequences for affected patients, the doctors involved and their employers. Medical staff working in inpatient specialties need to make sure their knowledge of the Act and the Code of Practice² are up to date.

REFERENCES

1. Jackson E, Warner J. How much do doctors know about consent and capacity? J R Soc Med2002; 95:601 -3[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Code of Practice [http://www.doh.gov.uk/pub/docs/doh/mhcop.pdf], accessed 19 June 2003

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This Article Full Text (PDF) Send a Quick Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Quick Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hardern, R Articles by Protheroe, D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?