RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2004;97:506
doi:10.1258/jrsm.97.10.506-a
© 2004 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, R. J
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, S. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2004;97:506
© 2004 The Royal Society of Medicine

Medication errors and confusion over labelling

Roxane J Hillier   Simon P Kelly

Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton BL4 0JR, UK

Dr Wheeler and his colleagues (August 2004 JRSM1) make a strong case for standardized labelling to avoid confusion over ratios and percentages in drug solutions. May we draw attention to another potential source of confusion in relation to drug labelling. The unlabelled ampoule in Figure 1, which we presume to have contained Betnesol (betamethasone), was taken out of its packaging during routine cataract surgery for planned periocular injection. Theatre staff reacted appropriately by discarding it, and we reported the incident to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. We also advised the manufacturers. The absence of a label was due to a manufacturing error, fortunately not coupled with the loss of coloured bands which do help to distinguish it from other products. However, this picture illustrates another potent source of error. Even when intravenous medications are correctly labelled, the similarity between their appearances is an example of a latent or potential systems failure.



View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. An assortment of ampoules, including one accidentally unlabelled. Colour version available on [www.jrsm.org]

 

REFERENCES

  1. Wheeler DW, Remoundas DD, Whittlestone KD, et al. Doctors’ confusion over ratios and percentages in drug solutions: the case for standard labelling. J R Soc Med2004; 97:380 –3[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, R. J
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, S. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Units Symbols and Abbreviations Sixth edition