Academic Department of Surgery, Royal Free and UCH Medical Schools, Charles Bell House, 67/73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7ED, UK
From their retrospective survey (December 2003 JRSM1) Mr Rai and Mr Thomas conclude that, in suspected abdominal tuberculosis, diagnostic laparoscopy is the investigation of choice. They do not refer to a similar report by myself and colleagues on 14 patients, in which we recommended diagnostic laparoscopy when the Mantoux test and/or ascitic fluid microscopy are negative.2 In Rai and Thomas' series it is difficult to know whether all 25 patients truly required this investigation. Do the authors advocate diagnostic laparoscopy as the primary investigation, or only when simpler and less costly tests have been uninformative?
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Main Evidence-based and complementary medicine J R Soc Med, June 1, 2004; 97(6): 308 - 308. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||