RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2004;97:170-173
doi:10.1258/jrsm.97.4.170
© 2004 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wright, N. M J
Right arrow Articles by Kay, D. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2004;97:170-173
© 2004 The Royal Society of Medicine

Homelessness and health: what can be done in general practice?

Nat M J Wright MB MRCGP  1 Charlotte N E Tompkins BA PGDip  2 Nicola S Oldham MSc  3   Debbie J Kay4

1 Centre for Research in Primary Care, Nuffield Institute, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9PL
2 North East Leeds Primary Care Trust
3 NFA Health Centre for Homeless People, Leeds
4 University of Manchester Medical School, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Nat Wright
E-mail: n.wright{at}leeds.ac.uk


    INTRODUCTION
Go to previous sectionTOP
 INTRODUCTION
Go to next sectionCOMMON HEALTH PROBLEMS
Go to next sectionHEALTH PROMOTION
Go to next sectionPRACTICE ORGANIZATION
Go to next sectionCONCLUSION
Go to next sectionREFERENCES
 
In England between January and March 2003, 31 470 households were newly accepted by local authorities as homeless.1 The large and increasing numbers of people so categorized have complex health, social and psychological needs, and in the past decade numerous centres have been established to provide primary care to homeless populations.2 Personal medical services legislation has made this possible; previously, the system of general practitioner (GP) fundholding was an obstacle to primary care for homeless people with complex problems.3 The new nationally enhanced GP contract will probably offer incentives for care of homeless people.4

What are the existing barriers for this group? In a report to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, they included surgery opening times, appointment procedures, location, financial disincentives and discrimination.5 Reasons for discrimination include perceptions that they are migrant, violent, antisocial or ‘undeserving’.6,7 Additionally, we contend that some homeless people face a further risk of exclusion because of their age, gender, ethnic background or sexual orientation. In primary care, challenging behaviour can be an issue, but categorization of an individual as ‘deserving’ or ‘undeserving’ takes no account of the societal factors such as unemployment and poverty that can lead to homelessness.8 The General Medical Council exhorts doctors not to allow personal views about patients' race, culture, gender, sexuality or age to prejudice the care they receive.9 This places a challenge to clinicians not to exclude people from healthcare on account of homelessness or possible drug-using culture.

A comprehensive account of the management of the common health problems associated with homelessness is beyond the scope of this paper. Here we seek to describe the principles of best practice.


    COMMON HEALTH PROBLEMS
Go to previous sectionTOP
Go to previous sectionINTRODUCTION
 COMMON HEALTH PROBLEMS
Go to next sectionHEALTH PROMOTION
Go to next sectionPRACTICE ORGANIZATION
Go to next sectionCONCLUSION
Go to next sectionREFERENCES
 
Drugs
Homeless people, in particular rough sleepers, have a higher rate of serious morbidity and mortality than the general population.10 The main health need is drug dependence,5 and the use of illicit intravenous drugs results in multiple morbidity including viral hepatitis (B and C), HIV infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, septicaemia, encephalitis, endocarditis, cellulitis and abscesses.11 Alongside this, many will be using multiple drugs, most commonly heroin and crack cocaine.12 For drug users in general, guidelines13 make the following points. Controlled drugs should be prescribed to such patients only with objectives agreed between GP, drugs worker and patient. There are now nationally accepted outcomes of drug treatment,14 and the strategy will depend on drug users' individual circumstances—for example, some drug users will request (and have the motivation to undergo) detoxification from opioids; clearly it is then reasonable to work to an outcome of cessation of drug use. For chaotic drug users, such an outcome is not realistic at first presentation and the aim should be to stabilize health and social functioning.This ‘harm reduction’ will include a decrease in the quantity of drugs used, improvement in physical health, less criminal activity and improved family/personal relationships. A substitute prescription of an opioid such as methadone or buprenorphine can help achieve these outcomes. If a maintenance prescription is given, the following points need to be considered:

Urine samples can be useful to check that the patient is adhering to the agreed programme.

Alcohol
Many homeless people have a chronic history of severe alcohol dependence17 with gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, neurological, cardiovascular or metabolic complications. Not to be forgotten is depression and the risk of suicide.

Commonly the homeless alcohol user will come to the general practitioner with a request for urgent detoxification. This should not be undertaken without adequate preliminary assessment and support. In particular, uncontrolled detoxification can lead to seizures (particularly in the first 24 hours), which can be fatal. The drug of choice to manage withdrawal is chlordiazepoxide. Previously Heminevrin (clomethiazole) was used, but this is more toxic in overdose and has greater addictive potential. A course of substitute vitamins also needs to be prescribed—high-dose thiamine for one week followed by maintenance vitamin B compound strong.

Mental health
Common mental health problems amongst homeless people include depression, schizophrenia, drug-induced psychosis and anxiety states.18 The direction of the link with homelessness is uncertain: possibly, mental ill-health can be both a cause and an effect.18 Compared with the general population, mental illness is overrepresented amongst young people (particularly rough sleepers), the principal conditions being schizophrenia, affective disorder, psychoses, ‘personality disorder’ and substance (including alcohol) misuse.19 Dual diagnosis is common, and many homeless people with mental health disorders have a history of criminal activity. The offences usually consist of acquisitive crime (to feed a drug or alcohol habit), damage to property or misbehaviour while intoxicated.20

Only a minority of homeless men have a history of violent crime. Less than one-third of homeless people with mental illness actually receive treatment.10 For some elderly people, mental illness is the entry into homelessness. For the general practitioner confronted with a homeless person who is mentally ill, the following principles are helpful:


    HEALTH PROMOTION
Go to previous sectionTOP
Go to previous sectionINTRODUCTION
Go to previous sectionCOMMON HEALTH PROBLEMS
 HEALTH PROMOTION
Go to next sectionPRACTICE ORGANIZATION
Go to next sectionCONCLUSION
Go to next sectionREFERENCES
 
Promotion of health to homeless people is fraught with difficulties21—not least because the population is so heterogeneous. When questioned, vendors of the Big Issue (who are themselves homeless) gave some priority to reduction of risk from drug injection.22 Here are some practical modes of health promotion in primary care:


    PRACTICE ORGANIZATION
Go to previous sectionTOP
Go to previous sectionINTRODUCTION
Go to previous sectionCOMMON HEALTH PROBLEMS
Go to previous sectionHEALTH PROMOTION
 PRACTICE ORGANIZATION
Go to next sectionCONCLUSION
Go to next sectionREFERENCES
 
There has been much debate over whether primary care is better delivered through specialized general practices working exclusively with homeless people than through mainstream practices.2,29 It has been argued that a specialized general practice for homeless people is ideal to engage homeless drug users presenting in crisis with a plethora of health problems. As well as stabilizing the acute medical state such practices can guide the homeless person in appropriate use of primary care. When these outcomes have been achieved the patient is encouraged to register with a mainstream practice.29 This switch can be difficult not only for patients but also for doctors when there is a strong personal commitment. Therefore, we think that a specialized practice needs the support of a dedicated GP liaison/resettlement worker. Specialized general practices for homeless people are only feasible in large urban areas. For rural homeless populations, the solutions lie in enhancement of existing mainstream primary care services.

Another issue in primary healthcare provision for homeless people is the tension between outreach work and practice-based work. The argument for outreach is based largely on an erroneous assumption that homeless people are transient30 and do not access primary healthcare. Since outreach work is much more time and cost intensive than practice-based work, our view is that it should only be considered in groups where access to treatment is difficult or for a time-limited intervention (such as a course of immunizations).

Working with primary care organizations
The Royal College of General Practitioners recommends that homelessness issues should be recognized as part of the core primary care organization (PCO) agenda. In a Statement on Homelessness and Primary Care31 it says that PCOs should provide resources for ongoing homelessness services, acquire a good understanding of the numbers of homeless people in their area and the problems they face, and should promote multiagency links and the sharing of protocols and operating procedures that facilitate integrated working and coordinated care. Historically such co-ordinated multiagency working for the benefit of homeless people has been difficult to achieve, for reasons including lack of clarity about the exact responsibilities and services provided by differing agencies, difficulties in sharing information, and failure to respond in an integrated coordinated way.32

Working with hospitals
When ill, homeless people seek help later than other people.2 They are over-represented in attendances at hospital accident and emergency departments.33 Whether their presenting complaints would be better managed in primary care is not clear; the reason for many attendances is overdose of medication or deliberate self-harm, so the high attendance rate could reflect the high prevalence of serious illness in this group. The GP will wish a homeless patient with severe illness to remain in hospital until fully fit for discharge, and in a homeless drug user this may be helped by prescription of substitute medication on the ward. The main goal should be to retain drug users on a hospital ward and not have them take their own discharge because of receiving too little substitute medication. Since the GP may wish to continue this prescription after discharge, practices working with drug users need close links with inpatient services. Currently many drug users taking methadone are discharged either without the medication or with sufficient for just one day. This puts undue pressure upon primary care. We would exhort hospital pharmacy departments to work with community pharmacists to ensure that homeless drug users receive sufficient substitute medication, to be taken under supervision, to last them until their appointment with the GP.

Working with other stakeholders
Joint working includes not only health partners but also other providers of services to homeless people including housing departments, social services departments and non-statutory organizations. Finally, and most importantly, GPs should seek to work in partnership with homeless people themselves, the ‘users’.

User involvement: active or passive?
In marginalized groups, patient involvement can be an effective means to better healthcare. In the case of homeless people, isolation, stigmatization and lack of choice present large obstacles.34,35 By involving these patients we can identify gaps in the service and modify practice accordingly.36 Such efforts go some way to counter the social exclusion that contributes to ill-health.37 The underlying principle is that all individuals, irrespective of status, should be allowed opportunities to participate in decisions affecting them.38 To this end, self-help and advocacy groups will sometimes be helpful in identifying important needs.

A pilot study conducted at the NFA (No Fixed Abode) Health Centre for Homeless People, Leeds, aimed to determine the most effective and appropriate methods to encourage and facilitate patient involvement. Thirty patients attending by appointment, randomly selected, completed a structured questionnaire exploring their attitudes to becoming actively involved in the service. The answers indicated that most were interested in influencing the running of the health centre and wanted to be involved in decisions that could affect future recipients of the service. They expressed motivation to make a difference, to pass on their experience, or to ‘put something back’. Some participants, especially those trying to lessen their drug use, expressed a feeling that involvement in the NFA would provide an ideal opportunity to refocus their lives. But the desire for involvement was not universal: some saw no need for change or regarded the NFA purely as a service to supply their medical needs, and a small minority said they did not have the time. These participants favoured a suggestion box to help individuals participate in decision-making but there was little enthusiasm for formal meetings.


    CONCLUSION
Go to previous sectionTOP
Go to previous sectionINTRODUCTION
Go to previous sectionCOMMON HEALTH PROBLEMS
Go to previous sectionHEALTH PROMOTION
Go to previous sectionPRACTICE ORGANIZATION
 CONCLUSION
Go to next sectionREFERENCES
 
In summary, there are now excellent models of primary care service provision to inform the healthcare of homeless people. These models have been developed from working with homeless populations as well as drawing upon best practice developed from related fields such as substance use. Primary care clinicians seeking to offer healthcare to homeless populations have the opportunity to be part of a rapidly developing sphere of healthcare with networks to support both clinical practice and continuing professional development.


    REFERENCES
Go to previous sectionTOP
Go to previous sectionINTRODUCTION
Go to previous sectionCOMMON HEALTH PROBLEMS
Go to previous sectionHEALTH PROMOTION
Go to previous sectionPRACTICE ORGANIZATION
Go to previous sectionCONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Homelessness Statistics: March 2003 and prevention of homelessness policy briefing. [www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/groups/odpm_homelessness/documents/downloadable/odpm_home_609797.pdf] accessed 28 January 2004

  2. Wright N. Homelessness: A Primary Care Response. London: Royal College of General Practitioners,2002

  3. Wood N, Wilkinson C, Kumar A. Do the homeless get a fair deal from general practitioners? J R Soc Health1997; 117:292 -7[Medline]

  4. National Enhanced Service—Enhanced Care of the Homeless. [http://www.doh.gov.uk/gmscontract/neshomeless.pdf] accessed 28 January 2004

  5. Griffiths S. Addressing the Health Needs of Rough Sleepers: A Paper to the Homelessness Directorate. London: Stationery Office, 2002

  6. Lester HE, Bradley C. Barriers to primary healthcare for the homeless. The general practitioner's perspective. Europ J Gen Practice 2001;7:6 -12

  7. Riley AJ, Harding G, Underwood MR, Carter YH. Homelessness: a problem for primary care? Br J Gen Pract2003; 53:473 -9[Medline]

  8. Neale J. Theorising homelessness: contemporary sociological and feminist perspectives. In: Burrows R, Pleace N, Quilgars D, eds. Homelessness and Social Policy. London: Routledge,1997 : 35-49

  9. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. London: GMC, 2001

  10. Bines W. The Health of Single Homeless People. York: Centre for Housing Policy,1994

  11. Wright N, Smeeth L, Heath I. Moving beyond single and dual diagnosis in general practice. BMJ2003 :326:512 -14[Free Full Text]

  12. Fountain J, Howes S. National Addiction Centre. Home and Dry? Homelessness and Substance Use. London: Crisis,2002

  13. Department of Health, The Scottish Office Department of Health, Welsh Office, Department of Health and Social Services NI. Drug Misuse and Dependence—Guidelines on Clinical Management. London: Stationery Office, 1999

  14. National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse. Models of Care for Treatment of Adult Drug Misusers. London: National Treatment Agency, 2002

  15. Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. Reducing Drug Related Deaths: A Report by The Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. London: Stationery Office, 2001

  16. Royal College of General Practitioners. Guidance for the Use of Suprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence in Primary Care. London: RCGP, 2002

  17. Wright N. Homelessness and primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2003;53:568 -9

  18. Crane M. The associations between mental illness and homelessness among older people: an exploratory study. Aging Mental Health 1998;2:171 -80

  19. Scott J. Homelessness and mental illness. Br J Psychiatry 1993;162:314 -24[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Lamb R. Deinstitutionalization and the homeless mentally ill. In: Lamb R, ed. The Homeless Mentally Ill. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1984

  21. Power R, French R, Connelly J. et al. Health, health promotion, and homelessness. BMJ1999; 318:590 -2[Free Full Text]

  22. Power R, Hunter G. Developing a strategy for community-based health promotion targeting homeless populations. Health Educ Res 2001;16:593 -602[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. Wright NMJ, Campbell TL, Tompkins CNE. Comparison of conventional and accelerated hepatitis B immunization schedules for homeless drug users. Commun Dis Publ Health2002; 5:324 -6

  24. Goldberg D, Cameron S, McMenamin J. Hepatitis C virus antibody prevalence among injecting drug users in Glasgow has fallen but remains high. Commun Dis Publ Health1998; 1:95 -7

  25. Taylor A, Goldberg D, Hutchinson S, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection among injecting drug users in Glasgow 1990-1996: are current harm reduction strategies working? J Infect 2000; 40:176 -83[Medline]

  26. Hagan H, Thiede H, Weiss NS, Hopkins SG, Duchin JS, Alexander ER. Sharing of drug preparation equipment as a risk factor for hepatitis C. Am J Publ Health2001; 91:42 -6[Abstract]

  27. Strang J, McCambridge J, Best D, et al. Loss of tolerance and overdose mortality after inpatient opiate detoxification: follow up study [Comment]. BMJ2003; 326:959 -60[Free Full Text]

  28. Oldham NS, Wright N. A UK policy on ‘take home naloxone’ for opiate users—strategy or stalemate? Drugs-Educ Prevention Policy 2003; 10: 105-19

  29. Lester H, Wright N, Heath I, RGCP Health Inequalities Standing Group. Developments in the provision of primary health care for homeless people. Br J Gen Pract2002; 52:91 -2[Medline]

  30. Wolch JR, Rahimian A, Koegel P. Daily and periodic mobility patterns of the urban homeless. Professional Geographer 1993;45:159 -69

  31. Royal College of General Practitioners. Statement on Homelessness and Primary Care. London: RCGP,2002

  32. Gill P, de Wildt G, eds. Housing and Health: The Role of Primary Care. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical,2003

  33. Victor CR. Health status of the temporarily homeless population and residents of North West Thames region. BMJ1992; 305:387 -91

  34. Homeless Network Annual Report 1998-1999. London: The Homeless Network, 1999

  35. Chambers R. Involving patients and the public—is it worth the effort? J R Soc Med2001; 94:375 -7[Free Full Text]

  36. Standing Conference on Drug Abuse. Getting Drug Users Involved: Good Practice in Local Treatment and Planning. London: SCDA, 1997

  37. Fisher B, Neve H, Heritage Z. Community development, user involvement, and primary health care. BMJ1999; 318:749 -50[Free Full Text]

  38. Neale J, Kennedy C. Good practice towards homeless drug users: research evidence from Scotland. Health Soc Care Commun 2002;10:196 -205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wright, N. M J
Right arrow Articles by Kay, D. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

History of the London Clinic