J R Soc Med 2005;98:49-53
doi:10.1258/jrsm.98.2.49
© 2005 Royal Society of Medicine
Emergency care for complainants of sexual assault
Martin Wiese MD MRCS 1
Catherine Armitage MB BCh 2
Jo Delaforce RGN 3
Jan Welch FRCP 3
1 University Hospital Lewisham, Lewisham High Street, London SE13 6LH
2 Archway Sexual Health Clinic, Whittington Hospital, London N19 5NF
3 The Haven Camberwell, Sexual Assault Referral Centre, Department of Sexual
Health, Kings College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
Correspondence to: Dr Martin Wiese E-mail:
wiese{at}doctors.org.uk
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Sexual assault in the UK is common. The British Crime Survey
(2000)
estimated that 61 000 women in England and Wales had
been raped in the
preceding year and found that this is the
crime that women fear
most.
1 Most women
and virtually all men
who have been sexually assaulted keep their painful
experience
to themselves and do not disclose it to police or healthcare
services.
2 Those
vulnerable individuals miss out on the prevention and
treatment of sequelae
such as sexually transmitted infections,
genital injuries and other trauma,
unwanted pregnancies, and
psychological morbiditywhile their assailants
avoid prosecution
and may go on to assault others.
Even when sexual assault is reported to the police, conviction rates are
low. In the year 2002, the police recorded 9723 female rapes. Only 2651
assailants were proceeded against and a mere 572 cases ended in a
conviction.3 Service
improvements that encourage complainants of sexual assault to seek help for
themselves and provide the forensic evidence needed by the prosecution to
secure a conviction are therefore clearly desirable.
 |
CONVENTIONAL MANAGEMENT AND ITS SHORTFALLS
|
|---|
Care for complainants of sexual assault is currently fragmented.
Emergency
departments treating injuries may not always address
other health issues
arising from the assault such as post-coital
contraception and screening for
sexually transmitted infections.
Expertise in the collection of forensic
evidence is usually
not available. Victims are therefore advised to report the
event
to the police, but not all police officers dealing with such
cases will
have had appropriate training in sexual offence investigating
techniques.
Owing to shortages of trained medical staff, complainants often have to
wait many hours before forensic examinations can be carried out. Their
distress is worsened by advice not to wash, so as to preserve evidence. The
procedure often takes place in a victim examination suite within
a police station rather than a health service facility. Infrequent use of the
rooms and high staff turnover mean that such facilities are difficult to keep
adequately clean and stocked. The forensic medical examiner is often male and
may not have specialist training in sexual offence examinations.
Finally, although psychosocial support is offered by many voluntary
organizations, local access to such agencies is
variable.4 It is
therefore easy to see why many complainants of sexual assault do not have all
their needs met and why the handling of forensic evidence is frequently
suboptimal.
 |
ADVANCES
|
|---|
The need for specialist services, termed sexual assault referral
centres,
has long been
recognized.
5 In the
USA and Australia,
such units have existed for over a decade and are often led
by
specially trained sexual assault nurse
examiners.
6,7
The first
centre in the UK was instituted at St Marys Hospital
in
Manchester in
1986.
8
The Haven Camberwell, the first such service in London,
opened in May 2000 as part of the Department of Sexual Health at Kings
College Hospital. Jointly funded by the National Health Service and the
Metropolitan Police, it works closely with the latters initiative on
sexual violence, Project
Sapphire.9 The aim
of this innovative partnership, which has undergone detailed evaluation,
10 is to combine
optimal initial case management by police officers trained in sexual offences
investigative techniques with the best available medical care. The centre
conducts over 850 examinations each year, thus dealing with about 8% of the
rapes reported in England and
Wales.11 Since
opening, it has cared for more than 3000 individuals, including at least 100
children aged under 12. One-fifth of its clientsthe preferred term at
the centreare referred by other agencies or refer themselves directly,
without initial police involvement.
With the launch of two similar centresThe Haven
Paddington at St Marys Hospital and The Haven
Whitechapel at the Royal London Hospitalon 15 July 2004, the
service is now available to all
Londoners12 and the
Home Office is supporting the development of further services in areas of the
country that do not yet have access to a sexual assault referral centre. A
full list of all sexual assault referral centres currently in operation can be
found at the Project Sapphire website
[www.met.police.uk/sapphire/].
| Box 1 Choices for clients at The Haven
- Medical examination and full statement to a specially trained police
officer
- Medical examination and anonymous provision of forensic samples and
information about the attack to the police
- Medical examination, anonymous provision of forensic samples and limited
information about the attack to the police
- Medical examination but no provision of forensic samples or information to
the police. Clients are asked to review their decision after two months
- No medical examination but completion of a form providing details about the
attack to the police
- Medical and/or psychological support services only
- Meeting with the police at The Haven to discuss the details
of the assault, without making it an official allegation
In options 27, clients can choose to remain anonymous or provide
some details about themselves to the police. For example, they may not want
the police to know their name and/or address but would be prepared to give
their age, gender and ethnic background. They can also decide whether or not
they want staff from The Haven or the police to discuss the
outcomes of the investigations into the attack with them. Clients may change
all these decisions at any time.
|
 |
WHAT THE HAVEN CAMBERWELL OFFERS
|
|---|
The centre serves women, men and children seeking help after
acute sexual
assault; children subjected to ongoing sexual abuse
are referred to local
community paediatric services. The
Haven Camberwell accepts
referrals from the police and
around 40 NHS organizations in South London, and
is also open
to clients who wish to refer themselves directly. It operates
24
hours a day, 7 days a week, by appointment arranged by telephone.
Clients can
usually be seen within one hour, although they may
have to wait a little
longer if another examination is in progress.
Specially trained female doctors
known as sexual offence examiners
conduct forensic examinations; children
under 13 years of age
are examined jointly with a community paediatrician.
Psychosocial
crisis support is immediately available. The need for post-coital
contraception
as well as post-exposure prophylaxis against blood-borne viruses
such
as HIV and sexually transmitted infections is assessed. After
the
examination a shower is provided together with new clothing
to replace any
items retained for evidence. All clients are
offered follow-up.
Forensic examination at The Haven is offered without
mandatory police involvement. Clients may choose from a range of options by
which they can control the extent of their disclosure, and are welcome even if
they seek only medical or psychosocial support (see Box 1). Forensic samples
can be stored indefinitely and so are available if a client decides to
disclose more information later. The flexibility of this innovative approach
is valued not only by clients but also by the police, since the additional
intelligence as well as DNA evidence gained has already led to identification
of several assailants, including serial rapists.
 |
IMPROVING EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE
|
|---|
One in eleven complainants of sexual assault initially seeks
help in a
hospital emergency department (The Haven Camberwell,
unpublished).
Most emergency physicians, however, have little personal
experience
in caring for such patients and the British Association for
Emergency
Medicines current guidelines for the management of assault
victims
do not contain specific advice about sexual
assault.
13
Cooperation with a specialist centre such as The Haven helps
not only to optimize care for complainants of sexual assault but also
simplifies their management in the emergency department. At Kings
College Hospital, an interdepartmental working party of consultants, trainees
and nurse specialists has developed a local model of such cooperation. It
allows emergency department personnel to concentrate on acute medical care,
which should always take priority over forensic considerations, and on the
collection of early evidence (see below).
Figure 1 shows the flowchart
guiding staff through the essential management steps that need to be
considered. The protocol is being adopted by an increasing number of hospitals
across South London served by The Haven. Participating emergency
departments have all appointed a named sexual assault link nurse to ensure
that staff awareness and training is maintained.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Emergency care for complainants of sexual assaultflowchart
STI=sexually transmitted infections; GUM=genitourinary medicine;
abdo=abdominal
|
|
 |
COLLECTING EVIDENCE IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
|
|---|
Although systematic gathering of forensic medical evidence is
the
responsibility of the sexual assault referral centre or,
where such a service
is not yet available, a forensic medical
examiner, certain samples should be
routinely collected in the
emergency department. These include a mouth swab to
help detect
DNA evidence of oral penetration, which few clients will disclose
initially,
and a urine specimen to assist establishment of evidence of
drug or
alcohol facilitated sexual assault.
| Box 2 Forensic medical evidence and consent
- Forensic medical examination and gathering of samples both require informed
written consent. If patients are intoxicated or clinically unstable early
evidence may be collected and stored for later consent, but any forensic
medical examination must be delayed until the patient has regained
capacity.
- The competence of patients under 16 years of age to provide informed
consent requires assessment along Fraser guidelines (formerly known as Gillick
competency) [Ref.
14] and these
patients should be given an opportunity for discussion with an appropriate
adult, ideally a family member aged over 18 years. A social worker may have to
be involved if an appropriate adult is not available. Similar principles apply
to individuals with learning difficulties.
- Patients who are not able to understand the relevant information in English
must be given access to a translator to conduct the discussion before consent
can be obtained. It is not considered appropriate to use a friend or family
member of the client for this purpose, since a translator who is not impartial
may influence the patients choices. The police are responsible for
providing a translator to any client they refer to The Haven
Camberwell.
|
The samples (together with written consent, see Box 2) should be requested
as soon as feasible, as patients should ideally not pass urine and neither
smoke nor drink before they are obtained. The Early Evidence
Kit, a small pack containing the necessary containers, instructions and
consent form has been developed for this purpose (see
Figure 2) and is available from
the Forensic Science Service for use both by healthcare professionals and by
police
officers.15

View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Contents of the Early Evidence KitK106.
[Reproduced by permission of the Forensic Science Service]
|
|
Other items that should be collected for later forensic examination include
any removed clothes, swabs used for wound cleaning or bladder catheterization
as well as tampons and sanitary towels. Paper sacks for clothing and plastic
evidence bags for other items are available for this purpose from the police.
Errors in the handling of evidence can be counterproductive, since the defence
team may use them against the case. Local sexual offence investigating
officers should therefore be invited regularly to provide brief training on
how to collect and package all such items and how to maintain the chain
of evidence.
The Haven is currently developing an educational package
intended to provide guidance and training for all of those involved in the
emergency care for people who have been sexually assaulted. The project is
funded by the Home Office and will be made available both as a DVD and on the
Internet.
It should be noted that the detection of the alleged assailants DNA
on forensic specimens collected from the complainant merely suggests that a
sexual act has taken place. Its presence alone does not prove that the act was
non-consensual, but in the updated Sexual Offences Act which came into force
in May 2004 the onus is on the defendant to prove that reasonable measures
were taken to gain consent for sexual intercourse. Previously, the burden of
proof lay with the
complainant.16
 |
CONCLUSIONS
|
|---|
Conventional services can leave complainants of sexual assault
with unmet
needs. Fundamental system changes will be necessary
if better care for this
vulnerable group of people is to be
achieved, along with higher conviction
rates. The establishment
of specialist sexual assault referral centres
offering better
access to forensic services and psychosocial crisis support
is
an important part of that process and deserves to be driven
forward at both
central and local levels.
Close cooperation between existing services and the new specialist units is
crucial and requires clear guidance for emergency department staff. The model
described in this paper is currently being adopted across London and could be
used wherever efforts are being made to improve services for those
patients.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We thank Saffron Schofield, emergency nurse practitioner, and
Dr Edward
Glucksman, Clinical Director, Kings College
Hospital Emergency
Department, for their contributions to the
working party.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Myhill A, Allen J. Rape and Sexual Assault of Women: the
Extent and Nature of the Problem. British Crime Survey. London:
Home Office, 2002
- Painter K. Wife Rape, Marriage and The Law.
Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991
- Kelly L, Regan L. Rape: Still a Forgotten
Issue. Briefing document for strengthening the
linkagesconsolidating the European Network Project. London: Child of
Woman Abuse Studies Unit, London Metropolitan University,2003
- Rape Crisis Centre
[www.rapecrisis.co.uk]
accessed 27 November 2004
- Duddle M. The need for sexual assault centres in the United
Kingdom. BMJ1985; 290:771
3
- Selig C. Sexual assault nurse examiner and sexual assault response
team (SANE/SART) program. Nurs Clin North Am2000; 35:311
19[Medline]
- Derhammer F, Lucente V, Reed JF, et al. Using a SANE
interdisciplinary approach to care of sexual assault victims. Jt
Comm J Qual Improv2000; 26:488
96[Medline]
- Lacey HB. Sexually transmitted diseases and rape: the experience of
a sexual assault centre. Int J STD AIDS1990; 1:405
9[Medline]
- Project Sapphire
[www.met.police.uk/sapphire/index.htm]
accessed 27 November 2004
- HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate and HM Inspectorate of
Constabulary. A Report on the Joint Inspection and Prosecution of
Cases Involving Allegations of Rape. London: Home Office,2002
- Kerr E, Cottee C, Chowdhury R, et al. The Haven: a pilot
referral centre in London for cases of serious sexual assault. Br J
Obstet Gynaecol2003; 110:1
5
- The Haven Paddington and The Haven Whitechapel
[www.thehavens.org.uk/articles/story_6.htm]
accessed 27 November 2004
- British Association of Emergency Medicine, Association of Police
Surgeons of Great Britain and Royal College of Nursing Accident &
Emergency Association. Guidelines for the Management of Assault
Victims. London: BAEM/APSGB/RCN, 1987
- Forensic Science Service
[www.forensic.gov.uk/forensic_t/inside/news/list_press_release.php?case=12&y=2002]
accessed 27 November 2004
- Gillick v. West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health
Authority [1986] AC 112
- Sexual Offences Act 2003
[www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2003/20030042.htm]
accessed 27 November 2004

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Williams
Emergency care for complainants of sexual assault
J R Soc Med,
June 1, 2005;
98(6):
295 - 295.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|