RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2005;98:292
doi:10.1258/jrsm.98.6.292-a
© 2005 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petrou, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2005;98:292
© 2005 The Royal Society of Medicine

Letters

The pain of venous cannulation

Michelle Petrou

2 Langside Crescent, London N14 7DR, UK

E-mail: michellepetrou{at}doctors.org.uk

Dr Sado and Dr Deakin (April 2005 JRSM1) refer to some of the practical reasons why ward doctors are less likely than anaesthetists to use local anaesthesia for vein cannulation. One of them is access to lidocaine. On an eight-hour shift a ward doctor might have to insert up to twenty cannulas; and, if on each occasion the lidocaine has to be produced from a locked cupboard by a nurse, time does not permit. However, time is not the issue here. I do not accept Sado and Deakin's conclusion that patients are suffering 'more pain than necessary'. Assessing the effect of local anaesthesia for vein cannulation, Rohm et al.2 in a recent study, found clear benefits for cannulae of 16G or greater but no advantages for 18G (green) and 20G (pink). These smaller cannulae are the ones used most often on the ward. If a 14G cannula is needed, this will probably be an emergency where local anaesthesia would unduly delay treatment. The arguments of Sado and Deakin are hazardous because they could be used unfairly in medicolegal cases. I see no argument for use of local anaesthesia in routine ward cannulation.

REFERENCES

  1. Sado DM, Deakin CD. Local anaesthesia for venous cannulation and arterial blood gas sampling: are doctors using it? J R Soc Med 2005;98:158 -60[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Rohm KD, Schollhorn TA, Gwosdek MJ, Piper SN, Maleck WH, Boldt J. Do we necessarily need local anaesthetics for venous cannulation? A comparison of different cannula sizes. Eur J Anaesthesiol2004; 21:214 -16[Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petrou, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Walking London's Medical History