RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2005;98:388
doi:10.1258/jrsm.98.8.388
© 2005 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibbin, K. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2005;98:388
© 2005 The Royal Society of Medicine

Letters

Higher surgical training in the UK

Kevin P Gibbin

Chairman, SAC in Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology, Queen's Medical Centre, University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK

The survey by Mr Ray and his colleagues (June 2005 JRSM1) will be of great help to the Specialist Advisory Committee (SAC) in Otolaryngology in our deliberations on the structure of training for those entering after August 2007. Their findings tend to support decisions already taken by the SAC, which has long recognized the variation in operative experience of trainees from area to area. Regarding major tympanomastoid surgery the SAC has recommended, for accreditation, a minimum of 10 operations in a 6-year training programme, a modest number that reflects the realities of existing training. We are trying to determine reasonable minimum numbers for other areas of practice.

In moving from the apprenticeship system to a more structured and taught method, we hope to deliver a higher standard of training in the reduced total period of 6 years; a 6-year training is the clear recommendation from the SAC in Otolaryngology, with the early years spent in Basic Otolaryngology Training rather than basic surgical training, though the two will overlap. Part of the aim of these changes is to reflect current practice in the UK: those accredited in the specialty must be capable of delivering a general service including management of a wide range of emergencies. Those planning a career in the more advanced aspects of otolaryngology will undergo further training via SAC-accredited 'fellowships'. Curricula have been established for the subspecialty areas.

REFERENCES

  1. Ray J, Hadjihannas E, Irving RM. Curtailment of higher surgical training: likely effects in otology. J R Soc Med2005; 98:259 -61[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibbin, K. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?