Media |
From Morn
To Noon he fell, from Noon to dewy Eve,
A Summer's day; and with the setting Sun
Dropt from the Zenith like a falling Star,
On LEMNOS th' AEGAEAN Ile
Milton, Paradise Lost, I: 742-6
The Greek god Hephaistos was, according to Homer, the son of Zeus and Hera. But Hesiod, in his Theogony, says that he was the parthenogenetic son of Hera. A skolion to the Iliad reconciles these two accounts by suggesting that Hera concealed the identity of Hephaistos's father because he was conceived before she and Zeus were married. This befits the modesty for which Hera was known, but it is surprising that Zeus, not a priggish god, nowhere trumpets his paternity. Perhaps he was ashamed of his disabled son.
Hephaistos was born lame in both feet, according to an epithet that various
authors gave himAmphigu
eis. We learn in the
Homeric Hymn to Apollo that Hera threw him out of heaven soon after
his birth because he was deformed, but the Iliad recounts that Zeus
threw Hephaistos out of Olympos because he defended Hera from him. As Milton
describes, comparing him with Lucifer, Hephaistos fell for a day, eventually
landing on Lemnos, where he was cared for by the Sintians. Milton says that he
built Pandaemonium, Satan's palace.
Later, in revenge for this ill treatment by his mother, Hephaistos fashioned a magic throne, which held her fast when she sat on it. Only when Dionysos made him drunk did he dissolve the spell. He is also credited with making Achilles' armour and Harmonia's necklace and with fashioning Pandora from clay. Hephaistos married Aphrodite, and of his offspring, Palaimonios is described by Apollonios as being crippled and Periphetes by Apollodoros as being weak in the feet.
Why was Hephaestus lame? We shall propose a diagnosis based on the history and physical examination, using the 6th century BC water-vase illustrated here (Figure 1). We note that depictions of the god changed with time from short and deformed to tall and normal,1 and that depending on the history and examination one chooses to adopt, different diagnoses are possiblethat is the fun of the game. We shall assume that Hephaistos was lame from birth, that both feet were affected, and that his affection was hereditary. We shall also invoke other features in the figure shown herethe abnormal upper limbs, the short stature, and some facial features.
|
We also rule out an acquired peripheral neuropathy secondary to arsenic poisoning, an affection of smelters.3 It may be that this afflicted models for the artists who depicted Hephaistos, if for example they were smelters who had been exposed to arsenic, but it does not fit the history we have proposed. Furthermore, it is more likely that Hephaistos became a smith because he hobbled rather than the other way round; in primitive societies a lame man with strong arms would be highly suited for smithery, other common occupations being ruled out.
The diagnosis that we favour, after Silverman,4 is diastrophic dysplasia, short-limbed dwarfism with bilateral rigid foot deformities, such as hindfoot equinovarus and forefoot adductus resembling clubfeet; upper limb involvement with contractures of the elbows leading to loss of extension but no loss of power; and progressive scoliosis, hip, and knee flexion contractures, which can cause stooping and limping. It has an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance, and may have been passed on to his children. There are lethal and severe variants, but there is also a mild variant, with a normal lifespan. Perhaps the blot below Hephaistos' left eye is a haemangioma, another feature of the disease. And his ear may be misshapen (it is different from the ears of the others in the picture), due to typical cystic change. An alternative diagnosis is pseudodiastrophic dysplasia, in which elbow dislocations are prominent,5 but very few cases have been described.
1 Fellow in Paediatric and Young Adult Orthopaedics, The Royal National
Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex and Great Ormond Street Children's
Hospital, London, UK
2 Reader in Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Clinical Pharmacology,
Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford, UK
Correspondence to: Manoj Ramachandran E-mail: manojorthopod{at}gmail.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Arnott The diagnosis of art: Diastrophic dysplasia and Hephaistos J R Soc Med, February 1, 2007; 100(2): 67 - 67. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||