Podium |
Professor, Vascular Diseases Center, University of Ferrara, 44100 Ferrara, Italy
E-mail: zmp{at}unife.it
IRON DEPENDENT INFLAMMATION IN CVD
Impaired venous drainage of the lower extremities, mainly due to venous reflux or to venous outflow obstruction, leads to a cascade of pathological events clinically graded by the clinical class (C) of the CEAP classification (Clinical, aEtiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological) of chronic venous disease (CVD).1 Varicose veins are the most frequent clinical sign in class C2. When oedema complicates varicose veins, the clinical picture is graded as C3. Pigmentation, lipodermatosclerosis and other skin changes are classified as C4. A small but significant number of the affected patients develop venous ulcers. Healed ulcers are classified as C5, whereas active ulcers are C6. Altered venous haemodynamics are a necessary but not exclusive element for explaining progression along the clinical classes to the point of skin lesion. In 1982, Browse and Burnand2 observed a peri-capillary fibrin deposition and speculated that cuffs act as a barrier to oxygen diffusion and nutrients, resulting in epidermal cell death. This mechanism of tissue injury has not yet been demonstrated. The fibrin cuff may be more properly considered a scaffold for tissue reparative processes. The cuff contains fibrin, but also laminin, fibronectin, tenascin, and types I and III collagen, encircling the dilated capillary vein3 (Figure 1A). The decline of the fibrin cuff theory over the last twenty years has led to investigation of other factors emphasizing inflammatory mechanisms as amplifiers of the insufficient venous drainage. Recent studies demonstrate a pivotal role for tissue iron accumulation in inducing and maintaining inflammation in CVD.4-9
|
Increased iron stores and interstitial protein extravasation are potent chemo-attractants and presumably represent the initial underlying chronic inflammatory signal responsible for white blood-cells recruitment and migration in the matrix (Figure 2B). In 1988, Coleridge-Smith observed leukocytes trapped in the venous microcirculation secondary to venous hypertension. This work paved the way to the investigation of the relationship between CVD and inflammation.10 The mechanism of white cell migration in the subcutaneous matrix was further elucidated by studies of the expression of adhesion molecules in a model of venous hypertension. Several studies confirmed the expression of these molecules, including ICAM, VCAM and selectins.11,12 Such adhesion molecules block circulating white cells on the vein wall and facilitate transmigration into the tissue. The predominant cells migrating into the extra-cellular matrix are macrophages and T-lymphocytes.12
|
|
The final step of the pathogenetic chain leading to matrix disruption and ulcer development involves over-expression of matrix metallo-proteases (MMPs) that are not substantially balanced by their physiological tissue inhibitors (TIMPs). MMPs cause a substrate-specific degradation of matrix components, including collagen, elastin and laminin. Unrestricted MMP activity can lead to matrix break down and ulcer onset.4,15 Some experiments demonstrate that local iron overload may induce MMP hyper-activation through the so-called MMP iron-driven pathway.4,16 However, the iron hypothesis does not readily explain why leg iron deposits in CVD produce lesions only in some individuals. We hypothesized that such individual differences could be genetically determined, and investigated the role of the C282Y and H63D mutations of the HFE gene, associated with hemochromatosis in Northern European populations. C282Y mutation significantly increases the risk of ulcer in primary CVD by more than six-fold,6 while patients carrying the H63D variant have an earlier age of ulcer onset by almost 10 years.5 HFE mutations are associated with increased iron efflux from the macrophage. Our findings support the hypothesis that lesions are promoted by enhanced iron release and ROS generation.4-9,13,14,16
PARALLELS BETWEEN INFLAMMATION IN CVD AND IN MS
Clinical observations sometimes suggest alternative explanations of previous findings. During a duplex scanning examination on the carotid arteries of a 55-year-old patient with multiple sclerosis (MS), I observed an unexpected reflux from the chest into the internal jugular vein after the patient coughed involuntarily. I then noted this unusual phenomenon in other MS patients (Figure 4).
|
There were previous reports of a close relationship between dilated cerebral veins and inflammatory lesions In MS. Fog17 showed that the plaques of cerebral MS arise from definite segments of large epiventricular veins and that the lesions digitating out into the cerebral hemispheres also consistently evolve in a corresponding vein relationship. Putnam18 showed plaques lined with gliotic tissue containing large veins, surrounded by hematogenous pigment (Figure 2A). On a cerebral hemisphere medial aspect, a number of vein-centred plaques spread beneath the lateral ventricular wall and surge up off of the corpus callosum under-surface. The stem and first branches of a large ventricular vein have grooved wide beds whose breadth is nearly three times that of the involved vessel diameters, a detail reminiscent of Charcot's first documentation of cerebral MS.19
Fibrin cuffs are not an exclusive finding of CVD, but are commonly visible around cerebral veins in the course of MS and today they are interpreted as ongoing reparative processes20,21 (Figure 1B). MRI venography confirms in vivo the close relationship between the main cerebral veins and the inflammatory plaques. In 94/95 MS lesions, a central vein was visible.22 When cortical lesions occur, they arise within the territory of the principal cortical veins.23,24 In another study, contrast MRI allowed documentation of the break-down of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Such an injury preceded other MRI abnormalities and the clinical evidence of a new lesion. This supports the view that a defect in the BBB, and therefore inflammation, is an early and possibly crucial event in the pathogenesis of a new lesion in MS.25
Inflammation in MS is characterized by expression of adhesion molecules,26 followed by a migration of macrophages and T-cells across the BBB. Infiltration of the matrix by macrophages, as in CVD, is considered a crucial step27 (Figure 3A and B). In both situations, macrophages appear with considerable intracellular iron stores due to phagocytosis of senescent erythrocyte. Iron overload in MS plaques has been demonstrated in vivo by MRI.28 In addition, we observed haemosiderin in the urine of patients with active inflammation of MS (personal unpublished data).
Iron-laden macrophages carrying the HFE mutation display increased iron export, increasing the risk of generation of free iron and free radicals, possibly extending tissue lesions.5,6 A study from Australia29 suggests that C282Y-HFE mutation is increased in MS cases of North Western European origin and supports further investigations into the role of iron metabolism in the severity of MS.
As in a venous ulcer, a key determinant of tissue injury is played by MMP9. Exactly as in CVD, the over-expression of MMP9 is insufficiently counterbalanced by its tissue inhibitor TIMP-1. MMP9 can trigger leukocyte transen-dothelial traffic through an altered BBB, and serum active MMP9/TIMP-1 is now considered an appropriate indicator of ongoing MS inflammation.30 Despite histological findings showing haemosiderin deposits encircling the central vein of MS lesions (Figure 2A), the iron-MMP pathway of activation is not considered in MS literature.
DISCUSSION
Table 1 summarizes the iron-dependent inflammatory chain in CVD and shows impressive pathophysiological similarities with MS. The critical point of the proposed parallelism between CVD and MS involves venous haemodynamics. In CVD, altered venous haemodynamics are considered the trigger mechanism of subsequent inflammation. In contrast, altered venous haemodynamics in MS are poorly studied. The possible role of venous reflux/obstruction in cerebral and spinal veins requires additional investigation. Earlier literature indicated that the inflammatory lesions spread counter-current to the normal venous flow direction, and the process of cerebral multiple sclerosis advances in a direction diametrically opposed to that of normal venous flow.17-19 Such circumstances should be further investigated with the help of advanced neuroimaging technology.
|
Although investigations on the role of iron in MS are still few, some evidence supports a pivotal role for iron in MS inflammation. The effect of manipulation of iron level was investigated in EAE, a form of induced autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice used as an experimental model of MS.31 The incidence of EAE was 60-70% in mice with a normal iron level and in iron-overloaded mice, but 0% in iron-deficient mice. The findings suggest that iron deficiency provides protection from the development of EAE31 and also challenge traditional views on what constitutes a normal level of stored iron.14 The authors31 noted that, `The failure of iron-deficient mice to develop EAE is impressive. Many of the pharmaceutical approaches to inhibiting EAE are less effective than iron deficiency.'
Another group32 investigated the serum concentration of soluble transferrin receptor (sTFR) in a group of MS patients. The levels were found to be significantly higher in patients with active MS, either in progressive or relapsing-remitting clinical form, than in controls. Serum ferritin levels were also significantly elevated in patients affected by the active and progressive form.32 Both findings support the hypothesis above described, which proposes local iron overload as the initial signal of the inflammatory chain in MS.
Although the primum movens of MS is still elusive, these studies suggest that iron-dependent mechanisms of inflammation seen in CVD could be relevant to MS. Future work on MMPs and on iron/macrophage interactions appears especially promising. However, because of its relevant epidemiology and its easily visualized lesions, CVD is an ideal model for investigating iron mediated mechanisms of tissue injury of venous and inflammatory origin, as well as the use of deliberate induction of iron deficiency as a treatment modality.
Footnotes
This article is based on a lecture presented at the Tripartite Meeting, EVF-AVF-UKVF, Royal Society of Medicine, London, 1 July 2006.
Acknowledgments This research was supported by the Italian Ministry for the University and the Scientific Research and by the Foundation Cassa di Risparmio di Ferrara.
Competing interests None declared.
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Franceschi The unsolved puzzle of multiple sclerosis and venous function J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2009; 80(4): 358 - 358. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Zamboni, R Galeotti, E Menegatti, A M Malagoni, G Tacconi, S Dall'Ara, I Bartolomei, and F Salvi Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2009; 80(4): 392 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.M. Mitchell, A.L. Dotson, K.M. Cool, A. Chakrabarty, S.H. Benedict, and S.M. LeVine Deferiprone, an orally deliverable iron chelator, ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis Multiple Sclerosis, November 1, 2007; 13(9): 1118 - 1126. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||