JRSM >
Volume 99, Number 7 >
Pp. 358-362
1 Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina,
Charleston, South Carolina, USA
2 Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College, London,
UK
Correspondence to: Arch G. Mainous III PhD E-mail: mainouag{at}musc.edu
 | SUMMARY |
|---|
 TOP SUMMARY INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Design Analysis of data on antibiotic prescribing for episodes of acute bronchitis/cough illness in ambulatory care and hospitalization for respiratory infections for adults between 1996 and 2003 in the USA.
Setting USA: ambulatory prescribing behaviour was derived from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey while hospitalizations in acute care hospitals were assessed in the National Hospital Discharge Survey.
Participants Adults 18-64 years old.
Interventions None.
Main outcome measures Proportion of visits for acute bronchitis/cough receiving a prescription for antibiotics and hospitalization for respiratory infections.
Results Ambulatory antibiotic prescribing practices for acute bronchitis/cough and hospitalizations for respiratory infections exhibited non-linear patterns over the 8 year period. However, antibiotic prescribing practices for acute bronchitis/cough and hospitalizations for respiratory infections had a weak/moderate negative association. For three of the seven yearly changes in prescribing and hospitalizations as one increased the other decreased (P<0.01).
Conclusions Ambulatory antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections was inversely associated with hospital admissions for respiratory tract infections.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Prescribing of antibiotics for acute bronchitis has been the focus of guidelines designed to decrease prescribing for this condition and thereby decrease antibiotic resistance.5,6 The guideline endorsed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American College of Physicians, American Society or Internal Medicine, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommended that antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated acute bronchitis should not be given routinely, regardless of duration of cough. However, the Cochrane review of the trials of treatment for acute bronchitis as well as several other meta-analyses have indicated that antibiotics have a moderate beneficial effect in the treatment of acute bronchitis.7-9 However, currently we have not been able to reliably identify the subgroups of patients that would benefit from antibiotics. Perhaps, more importantly, the guideline for acute bronchitis indicates that the evaluation of adults with an acute cough illness or presumptive acute bronchitis must first focus on ruling out serious illness like pneumonia.5,6 Thus, it is unclear whether an unintended consequence of a strategy to decrease antibiotic resistance has been to decrease the use of antibiotics in cases where antibiotics might be beneficial.
Data from the UK provide mixed results on whether decreased antibiotic prescribing has increased hospitalizations or complications. One study suggested that while antibiotic prescribing in the population for all conditions had decreased, hospitalizations for respiratory infections had increased.10 Another study indicated that, while antibiotic prescribing for all conditions had decreased, there was no significant increase in suppurative complications like peritonsillar abscess, mastoiditis or rheumatic fever in children.11 A third study examining data for the year 1997-1998 suggested that higher use of penicillin in the community was associated with significantly fewer admissions for major complications of respiratory tract infections.12 None of these studies directly linked antibiotic prescribing behaviour for treatment for specific conditions (e.g. bronchitis).
In the USA, although antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis among adults decreased during the 1990s, it is unclear whether changes in antibiotic prescribing were associated with hospitalizations for respiratory illness. The purpose of this study was therefore to examine the relationship between ambulatory physician antibiotic prescribing behaviour for acute bronchitis and cough with hospital admissions for respiratory infections in the USA between 1998 and 2003.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Ambulatory prescribing behaviour for acute bronchitis/cough
The NAMCS samples non-federally employed office-based physicians who are
primarily engaged in direct patient care; NHAMCS collects data from hospital
outpatient and emergency departments in the USA and excludes federal,
military, and Veterans Affairs hospitals. These two surveys are often combined
by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) to provide a nationally
representative picture of ambulatory
care.13 The surveys
have a threetiered multistage probability design based on geographic location,
physician specialty and individual visits within the practice. The NCHS weighs
each visit by taking into account practice location and physician specialty.
The weighting calculations also account for practices that were invited to
participate but decline to do so. This weighting of survey clusters allows for
data extrapolation to national estimates for all survey items.
For each patient visit up to three diagnoses (one primary and two secondary) are coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM).The NAMCS and NHAMCS drug lists use generic drug names. For the current study we focused on prescribing for acute bronchitis (466), bronchitis not otherwise specified (490) and cough (786.2) as the primary diagnosis. Up to six medications per visit can be recorded at the visit. Medications given either as samples or by prescription are included, and are referred to as prescribed in this study. Antibiotic prescription for each visit was identified by using both trade and generic named antimicrobial agents assigned by NAMCS and NHAMCS to each medication prescribed. Because the diagnosis cannot be directly linked to the medication, and to minimize the likelihood that an antibiotic prescription was unrelated to the principal diagnosis, we counted only those prescriptions entered as the primary medication related to the office visit on the patient record form.
Hospitalizations for respiratory tract infections
NHDS is conducted each year by the NCHS to collect information regarding
the characteristics of discharged inpatients. Approximately 500 short-term,
non-federal hospitals across the country are used in the sample. From these
hospitals, nearly 270000 inpatient records are collected each year.
As with the NAMCS and NHAMCS, the NHDS does not track personal medical care, but rather collects data on individual inpatient stays. These data provide a summary view of the burden of illness based on the morbidity of hospitalization. We operationalized inpatient stays for respiratory infections as hospitalizations with an associated ICD-9-CM code for any of the seven following recorded diagnoses. These included:
Analysis
The NAMCS, NHAMCS and NHDS each are based on a complex survey design that
allows the user to make population estimates. Our analysis used the
appropriate sampling weights and the analysis was conducted using SUDAAN to
account for the complex sampling designs (SUDAAN, Research Triangle Park, NC,
USA).
Since each year was a separate national estimate, we analysed the
prescribing behaviour estimates from each year controlling for the design
effect in the NAMCS/NHAMCS. We computed
2 statistics
based on the weighted estimates using Epi-Info (Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA). In an effort to examine the relationship
between antibiotic prescribing and hospitalizations, we computed Spearman
correlation coefficients on the weighted population estimates.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
Figure 1 indicates that ambulatory antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis or cough dropped in the late 1990s and increased in the new century. A nonlinear relationship was yielded for both antibiotic prescribing and hospitalizations for respiratory infections with a negative correlation between them (Spearman's r= -70.22). In three of the seven change periods investigated, as prescribing of antibiotics for acute bronchitis/cough increased or decreased the proportion of total hospitalizations did the opposite (Table 2).
|
|
We also examined the types of respiratory conditions that resulted in hospital admissions over time (Table 3). The proportion of hospitalizations for pneumonia, chronic bronchitis/emphysema, or other respiratory infections of the total respiratory hospitalizations for respiratory infections remained relatively stable throughout the 8-year period.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
However, this effect seems to be driven by variations in fewer than half of the years investigated. The effect is primarily centred between 1998 and 2002. If the analysis were limited to the years 1998-2002 rather than 1996-2003, the correlation would be 70.46 rather than the 70.22 that was found for the longer time period. It is important, therefore, to further examine this relationship over time because of the potential for transient changes in the overall relationship.
There are several possibilities that could explain our findings. Because these results are based on overall population effects, there is a good chance that, whilst these two phenomenon are linked together in time, they are not related. Antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis and the increase in hospitalizations for respiratory conditions easily could be two independent events.
Clearly, these results alone nor the previous ecological study in the UK can establish how ambulatory antibiotic prescribing and hospitalizations for respiratory infections are related or even whether they are related.10 Continued observation of the trends in antibiotic use and hospitalizations for respiratory illnesses may be useful; but in these ecological studies, the people receiving antibiotics may bear no relationship to those who are admitted with respiratory infections. A large observational study of patients with acute bronchitis that can look at individualized risks for hospitalization after antibiotic use and which can screen for the development of colonization with antibiotic resistant organisms would be essential to draw any firmer conclusions.
There are several limitations to this study. First, due to its sampling design and weights, the NAMCS/NHAMCS data presented here theoretically offers accurate estimates of physician behaviour. Although the current analysis uses existing data and the participating physicians were unaware at the time of data collection of the present study's aims, NAMCS/NHAMCS data are based on physician self-reports and may be affected by participants' preference to be seen as practising in a socially desirable fashion. The actual practice of participants in these surveys could be different than what they indicated on their data collection instruments or may differ in the times when they are not participating as subjects.
Second, this study links data regarding estimates of antibiotic prescribing within ambulatory care representative of the entire USA with estimates of hospitalizations for the entire population. These types of data are very useful and are available in the USA but are uncommon in many European countries. However, the data allow for an ecological study but do not allow us to investigate for a cohort of individuals what happens in the course of their illness when they receive or do not receive antibiotics. The data do provide a general picture of the relationship of prescribing behaviour to morbidity.
It is possible that physicians sometimes misdiagnose early pneumonia as acute bronchitis because there is a great deal of overlap in the two syndromes. When antibiotics are used routinely for acute bronchitis, this error never has any clinical consequences. But once clinicians begin to restrict antibiotic use for acute bronchitis, those cases that were misclassified may advance into more serious illnesses. This relationship would imply that physicians may need to be more cautious and assure that they rule out other more serious lower respiratory infections before making the diagnosis of acute bronchitis.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that reduced ambulatory physician antibiotic prescribing behaviour for respiratory tract infections was associated with higher hospital admissions for respiratory tract infections. Whether there is a true negative association between antibiotic prescribing and hospital admissions is an important public health issue and needs to be examined further in both ecological and individual level analyses.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Sponsorship The project was supported in part by grant 1D12HP00023 from the Health Resources and Services Administration. The authors' work on this manuscript was independent of the funders.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPSUMMARYINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. C. Winchester, T. V. Macfarlane, M. Thomas, and D. Price Antibiotic Prescribing and Outcomes of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in UK Primary Care Chest, May 1, 2009; 135(5): 1163 - 1172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Loens, L. Van Heirstraeten, S. Malhotra-Kumar, H. Goossens, and M. Ieven Optimal Sampling Sites and Methods for Detection of Pathogens Possibly Causing Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2009; 47(1): 21 - 31. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I Petersen, A M Johnson, A Islam, G Duckworth, D M Livermore, and A C Hayward Protective effect of antibiotics against serious complications of common respiratory tract infections: retrospective cohort study with the UK General Practice Research Database BMJ, November 10, 2007; 335(7627): 982 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-; hospitalizations -
-